From: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>,
Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>, Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] memcg: fix hierarchical reclaim
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:49:58 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090113184958.4baf965c.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090113184533.6ffd2af9.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
If root_mem has no children, last_scaned_child is set to root_mem itself.
But after some children added to root_mem, mem_cgroup_get_next_node can
mem_cgroup_put the root_mem although root_mem has not been mem_cgroup_get.
This patch fixes this behavior by:
- Set last_scanned_child to NULL if root_mem has no children or DFS search
has returned to root_mem itself(root_mem is not a "child" of root_mem).
Make mem_cgroup_get_first_node return root_mem in this case.
There are no mem_cgroup_get/put for root_mem.
- Rename mem_cgroup_get_next_node to __mem_cgroup_get_next_node, and
mem_cgroup_get_first_node to mem_cgroup_get_next_node.
Make mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim call only new mem_cgroup_get_next_node.
ChangeLog: RFC->v1
- add mem_cgroup_put of last_scanned_child at mem_cgroup_destroy.
ChangeLog: v1->v2
- cleanup. move all mem_cgroup_get/put to the end of mem_cgroup_get_next_node.
Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 7be9b35..322625f 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -633,7 +633,7 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_isolate_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
* called with hierarchy_mutex held
*/
static struct mem_cgroup *
-mem_cgroup_get_next_node(struct mem_cgroup *curr, struct mem_cgroup *root_mem)
+__mem_cgroup_get_next_node(struct mem_cgroup *curr, struct mem_cgroup *root_mem)
{
struct cgroup *cgroup, *curr_cgroup, *root_cgroup;
@@ -644,19 +644,16 @@ mem_cgroup_get_next_node(struct mem_cgroup *curr, struct mem_cgroup *root_mem)
/*
* Walk down to children
*/
- mem_cgroup_put(curr);
cgroup = list_entry(curr_cgroup->children.next,
struct cgroup, sibling);
curr = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cgroup);
- mem_cgroup_get(curr);
goto done;
}
visit_parent:
if (curr_cgroup == root_cgroup) {
- mem_cgroup_put(curr);
- curr = root_mem;
- mem_cgroup_get(curr);
+ /* caller handles NULL case */
+ curr = NULL;
goto done;
}
@@ -664,11 +661,9 @@ visit_parent:
* Goto next sibling
*/
if (curr_cgroup->sibling.next != &curr_cgroup->parent->children) {
- mem_cgroup_put(curr);
cgroup = list_entry(curr_cgroup->sibling.next, struct cgroup,
sibling);
curr = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cgroup);
- mem_cgroup_get(curr);
goto done;
}
@@ -679,7 +674,6 @@ visit_parent:
goto visit_parent;
done:
- root_mem->last_scanned_child = curr;
return curr;
}
@@ -689,40 +683,46 @@ done:
* that to reclaim free pages from.
*/
static struct mem_cgroup *
-mem_cgroup_get_first_node(struct mem_cgroup *root_mem)
+mem_cgroup_get_next_node(struct mem_cgroup *root_mem)
{
struct cgroup *cgroup;
- struct mem_cgroup *ret;
+ struct mem_cgroup *orig, *next;
bool obsolete;
- obsolete = mem_cgroup_is_obsolete(root_mem->last_scanned_child);
-
/*
* Scan all children under the mem_cgroup mem
*/
mutex_lock(&mem_cgroup_subsys.hierarchy_mutex);
+
+ orig = root_mem->last_scanned_child;
+ obsolete = mem_cgroup_is_obsolete(orig);
+
if (list_empty(&root_mem->css.cgroup->children)) {
- ret = root_mem;
+ /*
+ * root_mem might have children before and last_scanned_child
+ * may point to one of them. We put it later.
+ */
+ if (orig)
+ VM_BUG_ON(!obsolete);
+ next = NULL;
goto done;
}
- if (!root_mem->last_scanned_child || obsolete) {
-
- if (obsolete && root_mem->last_scanned_child)
- mem_cgroup_put(root_mem->last_scanned_child);
-
+ if (!orig || obsolete) {
cgroup = list_first_entry(&root_mem->css.cgroup->children,
struct cgroup, sibling);
- ret = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cgroup);
- mem_cgroup_get(ret);
+ next = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cgroup);
} else
- ret = mem_cgroup_get_next_node(root_mem->last_scanned_child,
- root_mem);
+ next = __mem_cgroup_get_next_node(orig, root_mem);
done:
- root_mem->last_scanned_child = ret;
+ if (next)
+ mem_cgroup_get(next);
+ root_mem->last_scanned_child = next;
+ if (orig)
+ mem_cgroup_put(orig);
mutex_unlock(&mem_cgroup_subsys.hierarchy_mutex);
- return ret;
+ return (next) ? next : root_mem;
}
static bool mem_cgroup_check_under_limit(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
@@ -780,21 +780,18 @@ static int mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(struct mem_cgroup *root_mem,
if (!root_mem->use_hierarchy)
return ret;
- next_mem = mem_cgroup_get_first_node(root_mem);
+ next_mem = mem_cgroup_get_next_node(root_mem);
while (next_mem != root_mem) {
if (mem_cgroup_is_obsolete(next_mem)) {
- mem_cgroup_put(next_mem);
- next_mem = mem_cgroup_get_first_node(root_mem);
+ next_mem = mem_cgroup_get_next_node(root_mem);
continue;
}
ret = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(next_mem, gfp_mask, noswap,
get_swappiness(next_mem));
if (mem_cgroup_check_under_limit(root_mem))
return 0;
- mutex_lock(&mem_cgroup_subsys.hierarchy_mutex);
- next_mem = mem_cgroup_get_next_node(next_mem, root_mem);
- mutex_unlock(&mem_cgroup_subsys.hierarchy_mutex);
+ next_mem = mem_cgroup_get_next_node(root_mem);
}
return ret;
}
@@ -2254,7 +2251,14 @@ static void mem_cgroup_pre_destroy(struct cgroup_subsys *ss,
static void mem_cgroup_destroy(struct cgroup_subsys *ss,
struct cgroup *cont)
{
- mem_cgroup_put(mem_cgroup_from_cont(cont));
+ struct mem_cgroup *mem = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cont);
+ struct mem_cgroup *last_scanned_child = mem->last_scanned_child;
+
+ if (last_scanned_child) {
+ VM_BUG_ON(!mem_cgroup_is_obsolete(last_scanned_child));
+ mem_cgroup_put(last_scanned_child);
+ }
+ mem_cgroup_put(mem);
}
static int mem_cgroup_populate(struct cgroup_subsys *ss,
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-13 10:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-13 9:45 [PATCH -rc] some fixes for memcg Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-13 9:47 ` [PATCH 1/4] memcg: fix mem_cgroup_get_reclaim_stat_from_page Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-13 9:48 ` [PATCH 2/4] memcg: fix error path of mem_cgroup_move_parent Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-13 9:49 ` Daisuke Nishimura [this message]
2009-01-13 9:50 ` [PATCH 4/4] memcg: make oom less frequently Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-14 8:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/4] memcg: don't call res_counter_uncharge when obsolete Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-14 13:43 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-15 1:03 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-15 2:00 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-15 2:14 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-15 4:38 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-15 5:14 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-15 5:49 ` Balbir Singh
2009-01-15 6:39 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-15 7:45 ` [RFC][PATCH] memcg: get/put parents at create/free Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-15 7:54 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-15 8:13 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-15 8:23 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-15 8:51 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-15 9:10 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-16 1:50 ` [BUGFIX][PATCH] " Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-16 2:12 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-16 2:17 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-16 2:25 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-16 4:22 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-16 4:31 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-14 13:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/4] memcg: don't call res_counter_uncharge when obsolete Balbir Singh
2009-01-15 2:48 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-15 3:08 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-15 3:24 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-15 4:17 ` Balbir Singh
2009-01-15 4:41 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-15 4:45 ` Balbir Singh
2009-01-15 4:54 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-15 4:52 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-15 5:17 ` Balbir Singh
2009-01-15 5:27 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090113184958.4baf965c.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--to=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox