From: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com,
balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, lizf@cn.fujitsu.com,
menage@google.com, nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 3/4] memcg: fix for mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 19:15:01 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090108191501.dc469a51.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090108190818.b663ce20.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
If root_mem has no children, last_scaned_child is set to root_mem itself.
But after some children added to root_mem, mem_cgroup_get_next_node can
mem_cgroup_put the root_mem although root_mem has not been mem_cgroup_get.
This patch fixes this behavior by:
- Set last_scanned_child to NULL if root_mem has no children or DFS search
has returned to root_mem itself(root_mem is not a "child" of root_mem).
Make mem_cgroup_get_first_node return root_mem in this case.
There are no mem_cgroup_get/put for root_mem.
- Rename mem_cgroup_get_next_node to __mem_cgroup_get_next_node, and
mem_cgroup_get_first_node to mem_cgroup_get_next_node.
Make mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim call only new mem_cgroup_get_next_node.
Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 288e22c..dc38a0e 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -622,7 +622,7 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_isolate_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
* called with hierarchy_mutex held
*/
static struct mem_cgroup *
-mem_cgroup_get_next_node(struct mem_cgroup *curr, struct mem_cgroup *root_mem)
+__mem_cgroup_get_next_node(struct mem_cgroup *curr, struct mem_cgroup *root_mem)
{
struct cgroup *cgroup, *curr_cgroup, *root_cgroup;
@@ -644,8 +644,8 @@ mem_cgroup_get_next_node(struct mem_cgroup *curr, struct mem_cgroup *root_mem)
visit_parent:
if (curr_cgroup == root_cgroup) {
mem_cgroup_put(curr);
- curr = root_mem;
- mem_cgroup_get(curr);
+ /* caller handles NULL case */
+ curr = NULL;
goto done;
}
@@ -668,7 +668,6 @@ visit_parent:
goto visit_parent;
done:
- root_mem->last_scanned_child = curr;
return curr;
}
@@ -678,20 +677,29 @@ done:
* that to reclaim free pages from.
*/
static struct mem_cgroup *
-mem_cgroup_get_first_node(struct mem_cgroup *root_mem)
+mem_cgroup_get_next_node(struct mem_cgroup *root_mem)
{
struct cgroup *cgroup;
struct mem_cgroup *ret;
bool obsolete;
- obsolete = mem_cgroup_is_obsolete(root_mem->last_scanned_child);
-
/*
* Scan all children under the mem_cgroup mem
*/
mutex_lock(&mem_cgroup_subsys.hierarchy_mutex);
+
+ obsolete = mem_cgroup_is_obsolete(root_mem->last_scanned_child);
+
if (list_empty(&root_mem->css.cgroup->children)) {
- ret = root_mem;
+ /*
+ * root_mem might have children before and last_scanned_child
+ * may point to one of them.
+ */
+ if (root_mem->last_scanned_child) {
+ VM_BUG_ON(!obsolete);
+ mem_cgroup_put(root_mem->last_scanned_child);
+ }
+ ret = NULL;
goto done;
}
@@ -705,13 +713,13 @@ mem_cgroup_get_first_node(struct mem_cgroup *root_mem)
ret = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cgroup);
mem_cgroup_get(ret);
} else
- ret = mem_cgroup_get_next_node(root_mem->last_scanned_child,
+ ret = __mem_cgroup_get_next_node(root_mem->last_scanned_child,
root_mem);
done:
root_mem->last_scanned_child = ret;
mutex_unlock(&mem_cgroup_subsys.hierarchy_mutex);
- return ret;
+ return (ret) ? ret : root_mem;
}
static bool mem_cgroup_check_under_limit(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
@@ -769,21 +777,18 @@ static int mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(struct mem_cgroup *root_mem,
if (!root_mem->use_hierarchy)
return ret;
- next_mem = mem_cgroup_get_first_node(root_mem);
+ next_mem = mem_cgroup_get_next_node(root_mem);
while (next_mem != root_mem) {
if (mem_cgroup_is_obsolete(next_mem)) {
- mem_cgroup_put(next_mem);
- next_mem = mem_cgroup_get_first_node(root_mem);
+ next_mem = mem_cgroup_get_next_node(root_mem);
continue;
}
ret = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(next_mem, gfp_mask, noswap,
get_swappiness(next_mem));
if (mem_cgroup_check_under_limit(root_mem))
return 0;
- mutex_lock(&mem_cgroup_subsys.hierarchy_mutex);
- next_mem = mem_cgroup_get_next_node(next_mem, root_mem);
- mutex_unlock(&mem_cgroup_subsys.hierarchy_mutex);
+ next_mem = mem_cgroup_get_next_node(root_mem);
}
return ret;
}
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-08 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-08 10:08 [RFC][PATCH 0/4] some memcg fixes Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-08 10:14 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/4] memcg: fix for mem_cgroup_get_reclaim_stat_from_page Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-08 10:59 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/4] memcg: fix formem_cgroup_get_reclaim_stat_from_page KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-09 0:57 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/4] memcg: fix for mem_cgroup_get_reclaim_stat_from_page Li Zefan
2009-01-09 1:05 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-09 2:34 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-09 2:41 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-09 4:32 ` Balbir Singh
2009-01-09 4:47 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-15 11:08 ` [PATCH] mark_page_accessed() in do_swap_page() move latter than memcg charge KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-01-15 11:12 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-15 11:30 ` Balbir Singh
2009-01-15 12:07 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-01-15 12:28 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-15 13:34 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-01-15 13:43 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-01-08 10:14 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/4] memcg: fix error path of mem_cgroup_move_parent Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-08 11:00 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-09 5:15 ` Balbir Singh
2009-01-09 5:33 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-09 6:01 ` Balbir Singh
2009-01-08 10:15 ` Daisuke Nishimura [this message]
2009-01-08 11:08 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/4] memcg: fix for mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-09 1:08 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-09 2:51 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-09 3:09 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-09 5:34 ` Balbir Singh
2009-01-09 5:33 ` Balbir Singh
2009-01-09 6:01 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-09 9:01 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-08 10:15 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/4] memcg: make oom less frequently Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-08 11:19 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-09 1:44 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-09 2:03 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-09 2:29 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-09 2:39 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-09 5:58 ` Balbir Singh
2009-01-09 8:52 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-01-09 9:03 ` Balbir Singh
2009-01-09 9:37 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090108191501.dc469a51.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--to=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=menage@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox