From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 18:29:49 -0700 From: "Martin J. Bligh" Reply-To: "Martin J. Bligh" Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [rfc][patch] Memory Binding API v0.3 2.5.41 Message-ID: <2008756258.1034620187@[10.10.2.3]> In-Reply-To: <20021015012015.GN4488@holomorphy.com> References: <20021015012015.GN4488@holomorphy.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: William Lee Irwin III Cc: john stultz , Matt , "Eric W. Biederman" , linux-kernel , linux-mm@kvack.org, LSE Tech , Andrew Morton , Michael Hohnbaum List-ID: >> No, the NUMA code in the kernel doesn't support that anyway. >> You have to use zholes_size, and waste some struct pages, >> or config_nonlinear. Either way you get 1 memblk. > > I thought zholes stuff freed the struct pages. Maybe that was done > by hand. The only place I see that used in generic code is calculate_zone_totalpages, free_area_init_core, free_area_init_node, none of which seem to do that. But cscope might be borked again, I guess. Must be done in each arch if at all ... which arch did you think did it? M. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/