Re: [BUGFIX][PATCH mmotm] memcg fix swap accounting leak (v3)

[Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

* KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> [2008-12-15 16:07:51]:

> 
> From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> 
> Fix swapin charge operation of memcg.
> 
> Now, memcg has hooks to swap-out operation and checks SwapCache is really
> unused or not. That check depends on contents of struct page.
> I.e. If PageAnon(page) && page_mapped(page), the page is recoginized as
> still-in-use.
> 
> Now, reuse_swap_page() calles delete_from_swap_cache() before establishment
> of any rmap. Then, in followinig sequence
> 
> 	(Page fault with WRITE)
> 	try_charge() (charge += PAGESIZE)
> 	commit_charge() (Check page_cgroup is used or not..)
> 	reuse_swap_page()
> 		-> delete_from_swapcache()
> 			-> mem_cgroup_uncharge_swapcache() (charge -= PAGESIZE)
> 	......
> New charge is uncharged soon....
> To avoid this,  move commit_charge() after page_mapcount() goes up to 1.
> By this,
> 
> 	try_charge()		(usage += PAGESIZE)
> 	reuse_swap_page()	(may usage -= PAGESIZE if PCG_USED is set)
> 	commit_charge()		(If page_cgroup is not marked as PCG_USED,
> 				 add new charge.)
> Accounting will be correct.
> 
> Changelog (v2) -> (v3)
>   - fixed invalid charge to swp_entry==0.
>   - updated documentation.
> Changelog (v1) -> (v2)
>   - fixed comment.
> 
> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/controllers/memcg_test.txt |   41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  mm/memcontrol.c                          |    7 +++--
>  mm/memory.c                              |   11 ++++----
>  3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: mmotm-2.6.28-Dec12/mm/memory.c
> ===================================================================
> --- mmotm-2.6.28-Dec12.orig/mm/memory.c
> +++ mmotm-2.6.28-Dec12/mm/memory.c
> @@ -2428,22 +2428,23 @@ static int do_swap_page(struct mm_struct
>  	 * while the page is counted on swap but not yet in mapcount i.e.
>  	 * before page_add_anon_rmap() and swap_free(); try_to_free_swap()
>  	 * must be called after the swap_free(), or it will never succeed.
> -	 * And mem_cgroup_commit_charge_swapin(), which uses the swp_entry
> -	 * in page->private, must be called before reuse_swap_page(),
> -	 * which may delete_from_swap_cache().
> +	 * Because delete_from_swap_page() may be called by reuse_swap_page(),
> +	 * mem_cgroup_commit_charge_swapin() may not be able to find swp_entry
> +	 * in page->private. In this case, a record in swap_cgroup  is silently
> +	 * discarded at swap_free().
>  	 */
> 
> -	mem_cgroup_commit_charge_swapin(page, ptr);
>  	inc_mm_counter(mm, anon_rss);
>  	pte = mk_pte(page, vma->vm_page_prot);
>  	if (write_access && reuse_swap_page(page)) {
>  		pte = maybe_mkwrite(pte_mkdirty(pte), vma);
>  		write_access = 0;
>  	}
> -

Removal of unassociated lines, not sure if that is a good practice.

>  	flush_icache_page(vma, page);
>  	set_pte_at(mm, address, page_table, pte);
>  	page_add_anon_rmap(page, vma, address);
> +	/* It's better to call commit-charge after rmap is established */
> +	mem_cgroup_commit_charge_swapin(page, ptr);
> 

Yes, it does make sense

>  	swap_free(entry);
>  	if (vm_swap_full() || (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED) || PageMlocked(page))
> Index: mmotm-2.6.28-Dec12/Documentation/controllers/memcg_test.txt
> ===================================================================
> --- mmotm-2.6.28-Dec12.orig/Documentation/controllers/memcg_test.txt
> +++ mmotm-2.6.28-Dec12/Documentation/controllers/memcg_test.txt
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>  Memory Resource Controller(Memcg)  Implementation Memo.
> -Last Updated: 2008/12/10
> -Base Kernel Version: based on 2.6.28-rc7-mm.
> +Last Updated: 2008/12/15
> +Base Kernel Version: based on 2.6.28-rc8-mm.
> 
>  Because VM is getting complex (one of reasons is memcg...), memcg's behavior
>  is complex. This is a document for memcg's internal behavior.
> @@ -111,9 +111,40 @@ Under below explanation, we assume CONFI
>  	(b) If the SwapCache has been mapped by processes, it has been
>  	    charged already.
> 
> -	In case (a), we charge it. In case (b), we don't charge it.
> -	(But racy state between (a) and (b) exists. We do check it.)
> -	At charging, a charge recorded in swap_cgroup is moved to page_cgroup.
> +	This swap-in is one of the most complicated work. In do_swap_page(),
> +	following events occur when pte is unchanged.
> +
> +	(1) the page (SwapCache) is looked up.
> +	(2) lock_page()
> +	(3) try_charge_swapin()
> +	(4) reuse_swap_page() (may call delete_swap_cache())
> +	(5) commit_charge_swapin()
> +	(6) swap_free().
> +
> +	Considering following situation for example.
> +
> +	(A) The page has not been charged before (2) and reuse_swap_page()
> +	    doesn't call delete_from_swap_cache().
> +	(B) The page has not been charged before (2) and reuse_swap_page()
> +	    calls delete_from_swap_cache().
> +	(C) The page has been charged before (2) and reuse_swap_page() doesn't
> +	    call delete_from_swap_cache().
> +	(D) The page has been charged before (2) and reuse_swap_page() calls
> +	    delete_from_swap_cache().
> +
> +	    memory.usage/memsw.usage changes to this page/swp_entry will be
> +	 Case          (A)      (B)       (C)     (D)
> +         Event
> +       Before (2)     0/ 1     0/ 1      1/ 1    1/ 1
> +          ===========================================
> +          (3)        +1/+1    +1/+1     +1/+1   +1/+1
> +          (4)          -       0/ 0       -     -1/ 0
> +          (5)         0/ 1     0/-1     -1/-1    0/ 0
> +          (6)          -        -         -      0/-1
> +          ===========================================
> +       Result         1/ 1     1/1       1/ 1    1/ 1
> +
> +       In any cases, charges to this page should be 1/ 1.
> 

The documentation patch failed to apply for me

>  	4.2 Swap-out.
>  	At swap-out, typical state transition is below.
> Index: mmotm-2.6.28-Dec12/mm/memcontrol.c
> ===================================================================
> --- mmotm-2.6.28-Dec12.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ mmotm-2.6.28-Dec12/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -1139,10 +1139,11 @@ void mem_cgroup_commit_charge_swapin(str
>  	/*
>  	 * Now swap is on-memory. This means this page may be
>  	 * counted both as mem and swap....double count.
> -	 * Fix it by uncharging from memsw. This SwapCache is stable
> -	 * because we're still under lock_page().
> +	 * Fix it by uncharging from memsw. Basically, this SwapCache is stable
> +	 * under lock_page(). But in do_swap_page()::memory.c, reuse_swap_page()
> +	 * may call delete_from_swap_cache() before reach here.
>  	 */
> -	if (do_swap_account) {
> +	if (do_swap_account && PageSwapCache(page)) {
>  		swp_entry_t ent = {.val = page_private(page)};
>  		struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
>  		memcg = swap_cgroup_record(ent, NULL);
> 
>


Looks good to me

Acked-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> 
Tested-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> 

-- 
	Balbir

----- End forwarded message -----
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>