From: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>,
Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>, Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp
Subject: [RFC][PATCH -mmotm 3/4] memcg: avoid dead lock caused by race between oom and cpuset_attach
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 21:24:50 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081205212450.574f498c.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081205212208.31d904e0.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
mpol_rebind_mm(), which can be called from cpuset_attach(), does down_write(mm->mmap_sem).
This means down_write(mm->mmap_sem) can be called under cgroup_mutex.
OTOH, page fault path does down_read(mm->mmap_sem) and calls mem_cgroup_try_charge_xxx(),
which may eventually calls mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(). And mem_cgroup_out_of_memory()
calls cgroup_lock().
This means cgroup_lock() can be called under down_read(mm->mmap_sem).
If those two paths race, dead lock can happen.
This patch avoid this dead lock by:
- remove cgroup_lock() from mem_cgroup_out_of_memory().
- define new mutex (memcg_tasklist) and serialize mem_cgroup_move_task()
(->attach handler of memory cgroup) and mem_cgroup_out_of_memory.
Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 5 +++++
mm/oom_kill.c | 2 --
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 9c5856b..ab04725 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ static int really_do_swap_account __initdata = 1; /* for remember boot option*/
#define do_swap_account (0)
#endif
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(memcg_tasklist); /* can be hold under cgroup_mutex */
/*
* Statistics for memory cgroup.
@@ -796,7 +797,9 @@ static int __mem_cgroup_try_charge(struct mm_struct *mm,
if (!nr_retries--) {
if (oom) {
+ mutex_lock(&memcg_tasklist);
mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(mem_over_limit, gfp_mask);
+ mutex_unlock(&memcg_tasklist);
mem_over_limit->last_oom_jiffies = jiffies;
}
goto nomem;
@@ -2172,10 +2175,12 @@ static void mem_cgroup_move_task(struct cgroup_subsys *ss,
struct cgroup *old_cont,
struct task_struct *p)
{
+ mutex_lock(&memcg_tasklist);
/*
* FIXME: It's better to move charges of this process from old
* memcg to new memcg. But it's just on TODO-List now.
*/
+ mutex_unlock(&memcg_tasklist);
}
struct cgroup_subsys mem_cgroup_subsys = {
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index fd150e3..40ba050 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -429,7 +429,6 @@ void mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(struct mem_cgroup *mem, gfp_t gfp_mask)
unsigned long points = 0;
struct task_struct *p;
- cgroup_lock();
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
retry:
p = select_bad_process(&points, mem);
@@ -444,7 +443,6 @@ retry:
goto retry;
out:
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
- cgroup_unlock();
}
#endif
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-05 12:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-05 12:22 [RFC][PATCH -mmotm 0/4] patches for memory cgroup (20081205) Daisuke Nishimura
2008-12-05 12:23 ` [RFC][PATCH -mmotm 1/4] memcg: don't trigger oom at page migration Daisuke Nishimura
2008-12-05 13:22 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-05 13:39 ` Balbir Singh
2008-12-06 2:47 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-12-06 8:18 ` Balbir Singh
2008-12-05 12:24 ` [RFC][PATCH -mmotm 2/4] memcg: remove mem_cgroup_try_charge Daisuke Nishimura
2008-12-05 13:24 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-05 12:24 ` Daisuke Nishimura [this message]
2008-12-05 13:27 ` [RFC][PATCH -mmotm 3/4] memcg: avoid dead lock caused by racebetween oom and cpuset_attach KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-06 3:35 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-12-05 13:52 ` [RFC][PATCH -mmotm 3/4] memcg: avoid dead lock caused by race between " Balbir Singh
2008-12-05 12:25 ` [RFC][PATCH -mmotm 4/4] memcg: change try_to_free_pages to hierarchical_reclaim Daisuke Nishimura
2008-12-05 13:30 ` [RFC][PATCH -mmotm 4/4] memcg: change try_to_free_pages tohierarchical_reclaim KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-05 13:54 ` [RFC][PATCH -mmotm 4/4] memcg: change try_to_free_pages to hierarchical_reclaim Balbir Singh
2008-12-06 3:42 ` [RFC][PATCH -mmotm 0/4] patches for memory cgroup (20081205) Daisuke Nishimura
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081205212450.574f498c.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--to=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox