From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>,
Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>, Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH -mmotm 4/4] memcg: change try_to_free_pages to hierarchical_reclaim
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 19:24:53 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081205135453.GC10004@balbir.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081205212529.8d895526.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
* Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> [2008-12-05 21:25:29]:
> mem_cgroup_hierarchicl_reclaim() works properly even when !use_hierarchy now,
> so, instead of try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(), it should be used in many cases.
>
Yes, that was by design. The design is such that use_hierarchy is set
for all children when the parent has it set and the resource counters
are also linked, such that the charge propagates to the root of the
current hierarchy and not any further.
> The only exception is force_empty. The group has no children in this case.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 12 ++++--------
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index ab04725..c0b4f37 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -1399,8 +1399,7 @@ int mem_cgroup_shrink_usage(struct mm_struct *mm, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> rcu_read_unlock();
>
> do {
> - progress = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(mem, gfp_mask, true,
> - get_swappiness(mem));
> + progress = mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(mem, gfp_mask, true);
> progress += mem_cgroup_check_under_limit(mem);
> } while (!progress && --retry);
>
> @@ -1467,10 +1466,8 @@ static int mem_cgroup_resize_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> if (!ret)
> break;
>
> - progress = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg,
> - GFP_KERNEL,
> - false,
> - get_swappiness(memcg));
> + progress = mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(memcg, GFP_KERNEL,
> + false);
> if (!progress) retry_count--;
> }
>
> @@ -1514,8 +1511,7 @@ int mem_cgroup_resize_memsw_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> break;
>
> oldusage = res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->memsw, RES_USAGE);
> - try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg, GFP_KERNEL, true,
> - get_swappiness(memcg));
> + mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(memcg, GFP_KERNEL, true);
> curusage = res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->memsw, RES_USAGE);
> if (curusage >= oldusage)
> retry_count--;
>
Looks good to me
Acked-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
--
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-05 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-05 12:22 [RFC][PATCH -mmotm 0/4] patches for memory cgroup (20081205) Daisuke Nishimura
2008-12-05 12:23 ` [RFC][PATCH -mmotm 1/4] memcg: don't trigger oom at page migration Daisuke Nishimura
2008-12-05 13:22 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-05 13:39 ` Balbir Singh
2008-12-06 2:47 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-12-06 8:18 ` Balbir Singh
2008-12-05 12:24 ` [RFC][PATCH -mmotm 2/4] memcg: remove mem_cgroup_try_charge Daisuke Nishimura
2008-12-05 13:24 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-05 12:24 ` [RFC][PATCH -mmotm 3/4] memcg: avoid dead lock caused by race between oom and cpuset_attach Daisuke Nishimura
2008-12-05 13:27 ` [RFC][PATCH -mmotm 3/4] memcg: avoid dead lock caused by racebetween " KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-06 3:35 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-12-05 13:52 ` [RFC][PATCH -mmotm 3/4] memcg: avoid dead lock caused by race between " Balbir Singh
2008-12-05 12:25 ` [RFC][PATCH -mmotm 4/4] memcg: change try_to_free_pages to hierarchical_reclaim Daisuke Nishimura
2008-12-05 13:30 ` [RFC][PATCH -mmotm 4/4] memcg: change try_to_free_pages tohierarchical_reclaim KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-05 13:54 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2008-12-06 3:42 ` [RFC][PATCH -mmotm 0/4] patches for memory cgroup (20081205) Daisuke Nishimura
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081205135453.GC10004@balbir.in.ibm.com \
--to=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox