linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"hugh@veritas.com" <hugh@veritas.com>
Subject: [PATCH  1/21] memcg-revert-gfp-mask-fix.patch
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 13:48:48 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081203134848.04b7bac6.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081203134718.6b60986f.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

My patch, memcg-fix-gfp_mask-of-callers-of-charge.patch changed gfp_mask
of callers of charge to be GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE for showing what will happen
at memory reclaim.

But in recent discussion, it's NACKed because it sounds ugly.

This patch is for reverting it and add some clean up to gfp_mask of callers
of charge. No behavior change but need review before generating HUNK in deep
queue.

This patch also adds explanation to meaning of gfp_mask passed to charge
functions in memcontrol.h.

Singned-off-by:KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

 include/linux/memcontrol.h |   10 ++++++++++
 mm/filemap.c               |    2 +-
 mm/memcontrol.c            |   10 +++++-----
 mm/memory.c                |   10 ++++------
 mm/shmem.c                 |    8 ++++----
 mm/swapfile.c              |    3 +--
 6 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

Index: mmotm-2.6.28-Dec02/mm/filemap.c
===================================================================
--- mmotm-2.6.28-Dec02.orig/mm/filemap.c
+++ mmotm-2.6.28-Dec02/mm/filemap.c
@@ -461,7 +461,7 @@ int add_to_page_cache_locked(struct page
 	VM_BUG_ON(!PageLocked(page));
 
 	error = mem_cgroup_cache_charge(page, current->mm,
-					gfp_mask & ~__GFP_HIGHMEM);
+					gfp_mask & GFP_RECLAIM_MASK);
 	if (error)
 		goto out;
 
Index: mmotm-2.6.28-Dec02/mm/memory.c
===================================================================
--- mmotm-2.6.28-Dec02.orig/mm/memory.c
+++ mmotm-2.6.28-Dec02/mm/memory.c
@@ -1967,7 +1967,7 @@ gotten:
 	cow_user_page(new_page, old_page, address, vma);
 	__SetPageUptodate(new_page);
 
-	if (mem_cgroup_newpage_charge(new_page, mm, GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE))
+	if (mem_cgroup_newpage_charge(new_page, mm, GFP_KERNEL))
 		goto oom_free_new;
 
 	/*
@@ -2398,8 +2398,7 @@ static int do_swap_page(struct mm_struct
 	lock_page(page);
 	delayacct_clear_flag(DELAYACCT_PF_SWAPIN);
 
-	if (mem_cgroup_try_charge_swapin(mm, page,
-				GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE, &ptr) == -ENOMEM) {
+	if (mem_cgroup_try_charge_swapin(mm, page, GFP_KERNEL, &ptr)) {
 		ret = VM_FAULT_OOM;
 		unlock_page(page);
 		goto out;
@@ -2491,7 +2490,7 @@ static int do_anonymous_page(struct mm_s
 		goto oom;
 	__SetPageUptodate(page);
 
-	if (mem_cgroup_newpage_charge(page, mm, GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE))
+	if (mem_cgroup_newpage_charge(page, mm, GFP_KERNEL))
 		goto oom_free_page;
 
 	entry = mk_pte(page, vma->vm_page_prot);
@@ -2582,8 +2581,7 @@ static int __do_fault(struct mm_struct *
 				ret = VM_FAULT_OOM;
 				goto out;
 			}
-			if (mem_cgroup_newpage_charge(page,
-						mm, GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE)) {
+			if (mem_cgroup_newpage_charge(page, mm, GFP_KERNEL)) {
 				ret = VM_FAULT_OOM;
 				page_cache_release(page);
 				goto out;
Index: mmotm-2.6.28-Dec02/mm/swapfile.c
===================================================================
--- mmotm-2.6.28-Dec02.orig/mm/swapfile.c
+++ mmotm-2.6.28-Dec02/mm/swapfile.c
@@ -698,8 +698,7 @@ static int unuse_pte(struct vm_area_stru
 	pte_t *pte;
 	int ret = 1;
 
-	if (mem_cgroup_try_charge_swapin(vma->vm_mm, page,
-					GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE, &ptr))
+	if (mem_cgroup_try_charge_swapin(vma->vm_mm, page, GFP_KERNEL, &ptr))
 		ret = -ENOMEM;
 
 	pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vma->vm_mm, pmd, addr, &ptl);
Index: mmotm-2.6.28-Dec02/mm/shmem.c
===================================================================
--- mmotm-2.6.28-Dec02.orig/mm/shmem.c
+++ mmotm-2.6.28-Dec02/mm/shmem.c
@@ -924,8 +924,8 @@ found:
 	 * Charge page using GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE while we can wait.
 	 * charged back to the user(not to caller) when swap account is used.
 	 */
-	error = mem_cgroup_cache_charge_swapin(page,
-			current->mm, GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE, true);
+	error = mem_cgroup_cache_charge_swapin(page, current->mm, GFP_KERNEL,
+					true);
 	if (error)
 		goto out;
 	error = radix_tree_preload(GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -1267,7 +1267,7 @@ repeat:
 			 * charge against this swap cache here.
 			 */
 			if (mem_cgroup_cache_charge_swapin(swappage,
-						current->mm, gfp, false)) {
+				current->mm, gfp & GFP_RECLAIM_MASK, false)) {
 				page_cache_release(swappage);
 				error = -ENOMEM;
 				goto failed;
@@ -1385,7 +1385,7 @@ repeat:
 
 			/* Precharge page while we can wait, compensate after */
 			error = mem_cgroup_cache_charge(filepage, current->mm,
-					GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE);
+					GFP_KERNEL);
 			if (error) {
 				page_cache_release(filepage);
 				shmem_unacct_blocks(info->flags, 1);
Index: mmotm-2.6.28-Dec02/mm/memcontrol.c
===================================================================
--- mmotm-2.6.28-Dec02.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ mmotm-2.6.28-Dec02/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1248,7 +1248,7 @@ int mem_cgroup_prepare_migration(struct 
 	unlock_page_cgroup(pc);
 
 	if (mem) {
-		ret = mem_cgroup_try_charge(NULL, GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE, &mem);
+		ret = mem_cgroup_try_charge(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, &mem);
 		css_put(&mem->css);
 	}
 	*ptr = mem;
@@ -1378,7 +1378,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_resize_limit(struc
 			break;
 
 		progress = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg,
-				GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE, false);
+				GFP_KERNEL, false);
   		if (!progress)			retry_count--;
 	}
 	return ret;
@@ -1418,7 +1418,7 @@ int mem_cgroup_resize_memsw_limit(struct
 			break;
 
 		oldusage = res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->memsw, RES_USAGE);
-		try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg, GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE, true);
+		try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg, GFP_KERNEL, true);
 		curusage = res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->memsw, RES_USAGE);
 		if (curusage >= oldusage)
 			retry_count--;
@@ -1464,7 +1464,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_force_empty_list(s
 		}
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
 
-		ret = mem_cgroup_move_parent(pc, mem, GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE);
+		ret = mem_cgroup_move_parent(pc, mem, GFP_KERNEL);
 		if (ret == -ENOMEM)
 			break;
 
@@ -1550,7 +1550,7 @@ try_to_free:
 			goto out;
 		}
 		progress = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(mem,
-						  GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE, false);
+						  GFP_KERNEL, false);
 		if (!progress) {
 			nr_retries--;
 			/* maybe some writeback is necessary */
Index: mmotm-2.6.28-Dec02/include/linux/memcontrol.h
===================================================================
--- mmotm-2.6.28-Dec02.orig/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ mmotm-2.6.28-Dec02/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -26,6 +26,16 @@ struct page;
 struct mm_struct;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
+/*
+ * All "charge" functions with gfp_mask should use GFP_KERNEL or
+ * (gfp_mask & GFP_RECLAIM_MASK). In current implementatin, memcg doesn't
+ * alloc memory but reclaims memory from all available zones. So, "where I want
+ * memory from" bits of gfp_mask has no meaning. So any bits of that field is
+ * available but adding a rule is better. charge functions' gfp_mask should
+ * be set to GFP_KERNEL or gfp_mask & GFP_RECLAIM_MASK for avoiding ambiguous
+ * codes.
+ * (Of course, if memcg does memory allocation in future, GFP_KERNEL is sane.)
+ */
 
 extern int mem_cgroup_newpage_charge(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm,
 				gfp_t gfp_mask);

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-03  4:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-03  4:47 [PATCH 0/21] memcg updates 2008/12/03 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-03  4:48 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2008-12-03  4:50 ` [PATCH 2/21] memcg-check-group-leader-fix.patch KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-03  4:51 ` [PATCH 3/21] memcg-memoryswap-controller-fix-limit-check.patch KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-03  4:52 ` [PATCH 4/21] memcg-swapout-refcnt-fix.patch KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-03  4:53 ` [PATCH 5/21] memcg-hierarchy-avoid-unnecessary-reclaim.patch KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-03  4:54 ` [PATCH 6/21] inactive_anon_is_low-move-to-vmscan.patch KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-03  4:55 ` [PATCH 7/21] introduce-zone_reclaim-struct.patch KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-03  4:55 ` [PATCH 8/21] make-zone-nr_pages-helper-function.patch KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-03  4:57 ` [PATCH 9/21] make-get_scan_ratio-to-memcg-safe.patch KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-03  4:58 ` [PATCH 10/21] memcg-add-null-check-to-page_cgroup_zoneinfo.patch KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-03  5:00 ` [PATCH 11/21] memcg-make-inactive_anon_is_low.patch KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-03  5:01 ` [PATCH 12/21] memcg-make-mem_cgroup_zone_nr_pages.patch KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-03  5:02 ` [PATCH 13/21] memcg-make-zone_reclaim_stat.patch KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-03  5:04 ` [PATCH 14/21] memcg-remove-mem_cgroup_cal_reclaim.patch KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-03  5:05 ` [PATCH 15/21] memcg-show-reclaim-stat.patch KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-03  5:06 ` [PATCH 16/21] memcg-rename-scan-glonal-lru.patch KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-03  5:08 ` [PATCH 17/21] memcg_prev_priority_protect.patch KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-03  5:09 ` [PATCH 18/21] memcg-swappiness.patch KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-03  5:11 ` [Experimental][PATCH 19/21] memcg-fix-pre-destroy.patch KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-04  9:34   ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-12-04  9:43     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-04  9:49       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-04 10:17       ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-12-03  5:12 ` [Experimental][PATCH 20/21] cgroup_id.patch KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-03  5:14 ` [Experimental][PATCH 21/21] memcg-new-hierarchical-reclaim.patch KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-04 11:00   ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-12-04 12:44     ` [Experimental][PATCH 21/21]memcg-new-hierarchical-reclaim.patch KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-03  5:15 ` [PATCH 22/21] memcg-explain-details-and-test-document.patch KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-03  5:20 ` [PATCH 0/21] memcg updates 2008/12/03 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-03  5:56 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-03  6:17   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081203134848.04b7bac6.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox