From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com
Subject: [PATCH 09/11] memcg: remove mem_cgroup_calc_reclaim()
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 21:18:19 +0900 (JST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081201211742.1CE5.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081201205810.1CCA.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
Now, get_scan_ratio() return correct value although memcg reclaim.
Then, mem_cgroup_calc_reclaim() can be removed.
So, memcg reclaim get the same capability of anon/file reclaim balancing as global reclaim now.
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
include/linux/memcontrol.h | 10 ----------
mm/memcontrol.c | 21 ---------------------
mm/vmscan.c | 27 ++++++++++-----------------
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
Index: b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
===================================================================
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -87,9 +87,6 @@ extern void mem_cgroup_note_reclaim_prio
int priority);
extern void mem_cgroup_record_reclaim_priority(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
int priority);
-
-extern long mem_cgroup_calc_reclaim(struct mem_cgroup *mem, struct zone *zone,
- int priority, enum lru_list lru);
int mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
struct zone *zone);
struct zone_reclaim_stat *mem_cgroup_get_reclaim_stat(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
@@ -234,13 +231,6 @@ static inline void mem_cgroup_record_rec
{
}
-static inline long mem_cgroup_calc_reclaim(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
- struct zone *zone, int priority,
- enum lru_list lru)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-
static inline bool mem_cgroup_disabled(void)
{
return true;
Index: b/mm/memcontrol.c
===================================================================
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -414,27 +414,6 @@ void mem_cgroup_record_reclaim_priority(
mem->prev_priority = priority;
}
-/*
- * Calculate # of pages to be scanned in this priority/zone.
- * See also vmscan.c
- *
- * priority starts from "DEF_PRIORITY" and decremented in each loop.
- * (see include/linux/mmzone.h)
- */
-
-long mem_cgroup_calc_reclaim(struct mem_cgroup *mem, struct zone *zone,
- int priority, enum lru_list lru)
-{
- long nr_pages;
- int nid = zone->zone_pgdat->node_id;
- int zid = zone_idx(zone);
- struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(mem, nid, zid);
-
- nr_pages = MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, lru);
-
- return (nr_pages >> priority);
-}
-
int mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct zone *zone)
{
unsigned long active;
Index: b/mm/vmscan.c
===================================================================
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1524,30 +1524,23 @@ static void shrink_zone(int priority, st
get_scan_ratio(zone, sc, percent);
for_each_evictable_lru(l) {
- if (scan_global_lru(sc)) {
- int file = is_file_lru(l);
- int scan;
+ int file = is_file_lru(l);
+ int scan;
- scan = zone_page_state(zone, NR_LRU_BASE + l);
- if (priority) {
- scan >>= priority;
- scan = (scan * percent[file]) / 100;
- }
+ scan = zone_page_state(zone, NR_LRU_BASE + l);
+ if (priority) {
+ scan >>= priority;
+ scan = (scan * percent[file]) / 100;
+ }
+ if (scan_global_lru(sc)) {
zone->lru[l].nr_scan += scan;
nr[l] = zone->lru[l].nr_scan;
if (nr[l] >= sc->swap_cluster_max)
zone->lru[l].nr_scan = 0;
else
nr[l] = 0;
- } else {
- /*
- * This reclaim occurs not because zone memory shortage
- * but because memory controller hits its limit.
- * Don't modify zone reclaim related data.
- */
- nr[l] = mem_cgroup_calc_reclaim(sc->mem_cgroup, zone,
- priority, l);
- }
+ } else
+ nr[l] = scan;
}
while (nr[LRU_INACTIVE_ANON] || nr[LRU_ACTIVE_FILE] ||
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-01 12:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-01 12:10 [PATCH 00/11] memcg: split-lru feature for memcg take2 KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-12-01 12:11 ` [PATCH 01/11] inactive_anon_is_low() move to vmscan.c KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-12-01 12:12 ` [PATCH 02/11] introduce zone_reclaim struct KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-12-01 12:13 ` [PATCH 03/11] make zone_nr_pages() helper function KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-12-01 12:14 ` [PATCH 04/11] make get_scan_ratio() to memcg safe KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-12-01 14:50 ` Rik van Riel
2008-12-01 12:14 ` [PATCH 05/11] memcg: add null check to page_cgroup_zoneinfo() KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-12-01 14:52 ` Rik van Riel
2008-12-01 12:15 ` [PATCH 06/11] memcg: make inactive_anon_is_low() KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-12-03 13:52 ` Balbir Singh
2008-12-04 6:14 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-12-01 12:16 ` [PATCH 07/11] memcg: make mem_cgroup_zone_nr_pages() KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-12-01 16:31 ` Rik van Riel
2008-12-03 13:58 ` Balbir Singh
2008-12-01 12:17 ` [PATCH 08/11] memcg: make zone_reclaim_stat KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-12-01 16:33 ` Rik van Riel
2008-12-03 14:06 ` Balbir Singh
2008-12-04 7:15 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-12-01 12:18 ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2008-12-01 17:09 ` [PATCH 09/11] memcg: remove mem_cgroup_calc_reclaim() Rik van Riel
2008-12-01 12:19 ` [PATCH 10/11] memcg: show inactive_ratio KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-12-01 17:10 ` Rik van Riel
2008-12-02 9:05 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-01 12:19 ` [PATCH 11/11] memcg: show reclaim_stat KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-12-01 17:11 ` Rik van Riel
2008-12-02 9:05 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-03 14:19 ` Balbir Singh
2008-12-03 16:15 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-02 4:25 ` [PATCH 00/11] memcg: split-lru feature for memcg take2 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081201211742.1CE5.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox