From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
menage@google.com, rientjes@google.com, rohitseth@google.com
Subject: Re: Make the get_user_pages interruptible
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:50:43 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081121145043.0e4b2bf9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <604427e00811201403k26e4bf93tdb2dee9506756a82@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:03:36 -0800
Ying Han <yinghan@google.com> wrote:
> make get_user_pages interruptible
> The initial implementation of checking TIF_MEMDIE covers the cases of OOM
> killing. If the process has been OOM killed, the TIF_MEMDIE is set and it
> return immediately. This patch includes:
>
> 1. add the case that the SIGKILL is sent by user processes. The process can
> try to get_user_pages() unlimited memory even if a user process has sent a
> SIGKILL to it(maybe a monitor find the process exceed its memory limit and
> try to kill it). In the old implementation, the SIGKILL won't be handled
> until the get_user_pages() returns.
>
> 2. change the return value to be ERESTARTSYS. It makes no sense to return
> ENOMEM if the get_user_pages returned by getting a SIGKILL signal.
> Considering the general convention for a system call interrupted by a
> signal is ERESTARTNOSYS, so the current return value is consistant to that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
> Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
>
>
This isn't right?
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -1218,12 +1218,11 @@ int __get_user_pages(struct task_struct *tsk, struct m
> struct page *page;
>
> /*
> - * If tsk is ooming, cut off its access to large memory
> - * allocations. It has a pending SIGKILL, but it can't
> - * be processed until returning to user space.
> + * If we have a pending SIGKILL, don't keep
> + * allocating memory.
> */
> - if (unlikely(test_tsk_thread_flag(tsk, TIF_MEMDIE)))
> - return i ? i : -ENOMEM;
> + if (sigkill_pending(current))
> + return -ERESTARTSYS;
>
> if (write)
> foll_flags |= FOLL_WRITE;
If this function has already put some page*'s into *pages, they will be
leaked. The function fails to release those pages and it does not
provide sufficient information to callers to allow them to release the
pages.
I thought I already mentioned that last time I saw this patch?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-21 22:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-20 22:03 Ying Han
2008-11-21 22:50 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-11-21 23:24 ` David Rientjes
2008-11-22 0:06 ` Ying Han
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081121145043.0e4b2bf9.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rohitseth@google.com \
--cc=yinghan@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox