From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp, Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/6] memcg: free all at rmdir
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:38:15 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081113123816.873477a1.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <491B9E8B.3080301@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:57:07 +0530
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:44:59 +0530
> > Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> >> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:07:58 -0800
> >>> Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >>>> If we do this then we can make the above "keep" behaviour non-optional,
> >>>> and the operator gets to choose whether or not to drop the caches
> >>>> before doing the rmdir.
> >>>>
> >>>> Plus, we get a new per-memcg drop_caches capability. And it's a nicer
> >>>> interface, and it doesn't have the obvious races which on_rmdir has,
> >>>> etc.
> >>>>
> >>>> hm?
> >>>>
> >>> Balbir, how would you want to do ?
> >>>
> >>> I planned to post shrink_uage patch later (it's easy to be implemented) regardless
> >>> of acceptance of this patch.
> >>>
> >>> So, I think we should add shrink_usage now and drop this is a way to go.
> >> I am a bit concerned about dropping stuff at will later. Ubuntu 8.10 has memory
> >> controller enabled and we exposed memory.force_empty interface there and now
> >> we've dropped it (bad on our part). I think we should have deprecated it and
> >> dropped it later.
> >>
> > I *was* documented as "for debug only".
> >
>
> I know, but I suspect users won't. I am not blaming you in person, just trying
> the find way to do such things. I think I've seen sysfs add a deprecated option
> and put all deprecated files there, they are only created if someone cares about
> them.
>
Ah, but it should be done in cgroup layer.
> > Hmm, adding force_empty again to do "shrink usage to 0" is another choice.
>
> Yes, sounds reasonable.
>
ok, will post a patch today.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-13 3:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-12 3:26 [RFC][PATCH 0/6] memcg updates (12/Nov/2008) KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-12 3:26 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/6] memcg: free all at rmdir KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-12 6:07 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-13 0:07 ` Andrew Morton
2008-11-13 0:23 ` Balbir Singh
2008-11-13 0:46 ` Andrew Morton
2008-11-13 0:48 ` Balbir Singh
2008-11-13 1:04 ` Andrew Morton
2008-11-13 1:17 ` Balbir Singh
2008-11-13 2:30 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-13 1:13 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-13 1:20 ` Balbir Singh
2008-11-13 1:27 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-13 2:49 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-13 3:14 ` Balbir Singh
2008-11-13 3:22 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-13 3:27 ` Balbir Singh
2008-11-13 3:38 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2008-11-12 3:27 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/6] memcg: account swapcache KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-12 3:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/6] memcg: mem+swap controller kconfig KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-12 3:29 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/6] memcg: swap cgroup for remembering account KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-12 4:17 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-11-12 4:22 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-12 3:30 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/6] memcg: mem+swap controller KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-12 3:32 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/6] memcg: synchronized LRU KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-12 3:33 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/6] memcg updates (12/Nov/2008) KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-12 4:00 ` Balbir Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081113123816.873477a1.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox