From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 10:35:10 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: [patch 0/7] cpu alloc stage 2 Message-Id: <20081113103510.4a6a1d3a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: References: <20081105231634.133252042@quilx.com> <20081112175717.4a1fd679.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Thu__13_Nov_2008_10_35_10_+1100_n9BlKlxVSkxb0gEe" Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Christoph Lameter Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, Pekka Enberg , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, travis@sgi.com, Vegard Nossum List-ID: --Signature=_Thu__13_Nov_2008_10_35_10_+1100_n9BlKlxVSkxb0gEe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Christoph, On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 14:07:51 -0600 (CST) Christoph Lameter wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >=20 > > I have seen some discussion of these patches (and some fixes for the > > previous set). Are they in a state that they should be in linux-next y= et? >=20 > I will push out a new patchset and tree in the next hour or so for > you to merge into linux-next. Why not just add these to the cpu_alloc tree I already have? --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Thu__13_Nov_2008_10_35_10_+1100_n9BlKlxVSkxb0gEe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkkbaC4ACgkQjjKRsyhoI8wulgCgv7WYsE94r4luahE5YkzCllqS Dl8Ani5U6jiu8ppKr4lCulc1KpfmVIl9 =DBnI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Thu__13_Nov_2008_10_35_10_+1100_n9BlKlxVSkxb0gEe-- -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org