From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp ([10.0.50.73]) by fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp (Fujitsu Gateway) with ESMTP id m9M6dhVG027079 for (envelope-from kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com); Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:39:43 +0900 Received: from smail (m3 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 013D32AC026 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:39:43 +0900 (JST) Received: from s6.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s6.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.96]) by m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD99612C0A7 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:39:42 +0900 (JST) Received: from s6.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s6.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EA8E1DB8041 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:39:42 +0900 (JST) Received: from ml11.s.css.fujitsu.com (ml11.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.249.87.101]) by s6.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28C501DB803F for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:39:42 +0900 (JST) From: KOSAKI Motohiro Subject: Re: [patch] mm: more likely reclaim MADV_SEQUENTIAL mappings II In-Reply-To: <87ljwhfo4e.fsf@saeurebad.de> References: <87r669fq2v.fsf@saeurebad.de> <87ljwhfo4e.fsf@saeurebad.de> Message-Id: <20081022152911.1CD9.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:39:41 +0900 (JST) Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Johannes Weiner Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Andrew Morton , npiggin@suse.de, riel@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: > >> Is http://hannes.saeurebad.de/madvseq/ still true with this version? > > > > No, sorry, still running benchmarks on this version. Coming up > > soon... > > Ok, reran the tests I used for the data on this website and updated it. > Take a look. I am quite overwhelmed by the results, hehe. > > Kosaki-san, could you perhaps run the tests you did for the previous > patch on this one, too? I am not getting any stable results for > throughput measuring... Usually, any reclaim throughput mesurement isn't stable. Then I used an average of five times mesurement. Unfortunately, I can't understand I should mesure which patch combination because you and Nick post many patches of this issue related yesterday. Please let me know it? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org