* [PATCH][BUGFIX] memcg: fix page_cgroup allocation
@ 2008-10-22 1:24 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-10-22 1:37 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki @ 2008-10-22 1:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akpm; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, balbir, mingo, lizf, nishimura
Andrew, this is a fix to "x86 cannot boot if memcg is enabled" problem in Linus's git-tree,0
fix to "memcg: allocate all page_cgroup at boot" patch.
Thank you for all helps!
(*) I and Balbir tested this. other testers are welcome :)
-Kame
==
page_cgroup_init() is called from mem_cgroup_init(). But at this
point, we cannot call alloc_bootmem().
(and this caused panic at boot.)
This patch moves page_cgroup_init() to init/main.c.
Time table is following:
==
parse_args(). # we can trust mem_cgroup_subsys.disabled bit after this.
....
cgroup_init_early() # "early" init of cgroup.
....
setup_arch() # memmap is allocated.
...
page_cgroup_init();
mem_init(); # we cannot call alloc_bootmem after this.
....
cgroup_init() # mem_cgroup is initialized.
==
Before page_cgroup_init(), mem_map must be initialized. So,
I added page_cgroup_init() to init/main.c directly.
(*) maybe this is not very clean but
- cgroup_init_early() is too early
- in cgroup_init(), we have to use vmalloc instead of alloc_bootmem().
use of vmalloc area in x86-32 is important and we should avoid very large
vmalloc() in x86-32. So, we want to use alloc_bootmem() and added page_cgroup_init()
directly to init/main.c
Acked-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
init/main.c | 2 ++
mm/memcontrol.c | 1 -
mm/page_cgroup.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/init/main.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/init/main.c
+++ linux-2.6/init/main.c
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@
#include <linux/signal.h>
#include <linux/idr.h>
#include <linux/ftrace.h>
+#include <linux/page_cgroup.h>
#include <asm/io.h>
#include <asm/bugs.h>
@@ -647,6 +648,7 @@ asmlinkage void __init start_kernel(void
vmalloc_init();
vfs_caches_init_early();
cpuset_init_early();
+ page_cgroup_init();
mem_init();
enable_debug_pagealloc();
cpu_hotplug_init();
Index: linux-2.6/mm/memcontrol.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ linux-2.6/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1088,7 +1088,6 @@ mem_cgroup_create(struct cgroup_subsys *
int node;
if (unlikely((cont->parent) == NULL)) {
- page_cgroup_init();
mem = &init_mem_cgroup;
} else {
mem = mem_cgroup_alloc();
Index: linux-2.6/mm/page_cgroup.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/page_cgroup.c
+++ linux-2.6/mm/page_cgroup.c
@@ -4,7 +4,12 @@
#include <linux/bit_spinlock.h>
#include <linux/page_cgroup.h>
#include <linux/hash.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/memory.h>
+#include <linux/cgroup.h>
+
+extern struct cgroup_subsys mem_cgroup_subsys;
+
static void __meminit
__init_page_cgroup(struct page_cgroup *pc, unsigned long pfn)
@@ -66,6 +71,9 @@ void __init page_cgroup_init(void)
int nid, fail;
+ if (mem_cgroup_subsys.disabled)
+ return;
+
for_each_online_node(nid) {
fail = alloc_node_page_cgroup(nid);
if (fail)
@@ -106,9 +114,14 @@ int __meminit init_section_page_cgroup(u
nid = page_to_nid(pfn_to_page(pfn));
table_size = sizeof(struct page_cgroup) * PAGES_PER_SECTION;
- base = kmalloc_node(table_size, GFP_KERNEL, nid);
- if (!base)
- base = vmalloc_node(table_size, nid);
+ if (slab_is_available()) {
+ base = kmalloc_node(table_size, GFP_KERNEL, nid);
+ if (!base)
+ base = vmalloc_node(table_size, nid);
+ } else {
+ base = __alloc_bootmem_node_nopanic(NODE_DATA(nid), table_size,
+ PAGE_SIZE, __pa(MAX_DMA_ADDRESS));
+ }
if (!base) {
printk(KERN_ERR "page cgroup allocation failure\n");
@@ -135,11 +148,16 @@ void __free_page_cgroup(unsigned long pf
if (!ms || !ms->page_cgroup)
return;
base = ms->page_cgroup + pfn;
- ms->page_cgroup = NULL;
- if (is_vmalloc_addr(base))
+ if (is_vmalloc_addr(base)) {
vfree(base);
- else
- kfree(base);
+ ms->page_cgroup = NULL;
+ } else {
+ struct page *page = virt_to_page(base);
+ if (!PageReserved(page)) { /* Is bootmem ? */
+ kfree(base);
+ ms->page_cgroup = NULL;
+ }
+ }
}
int online_page_cgroup(unsigned long start_pfn,
@@ -213,6 +231,9 @@ void __init page_cgroup_init(void)
unsigned long pfn;
int fail = 0;
+ if (mem_cgroup_subsys.disabled)
+ return;
+
for (pfn = 0; !fail && pfn < max_pfn; pfn += PAGES_PER_SECTION) {
if (!pfn_present(pfn))
continue;
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH][BUGFIX] memcg: fix page_cgroup allocation
2008-10-22 1:24 [PATCH][BUGFIX] memcg: fix page_cgroup allocation KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
@ 2008-10-22 1:37 ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-22 1:42 ` Li Zefan
2008-10-22 1:42 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2008-10-22 1:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, balbir, mingo, lizf, nishimura
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 10:24:04 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Andrew, this is a fix to "x86 cannot boot if memcg is enabled" problem in Linus's git-tree,0
> fix to "memcg: allocate all page_cgroup at boot" patch.
>
> Thank you for all helps!
> (*) I and Balbir tested this. other testers are welcome :)
> -Kame
> ==
>
> page_cgroup_init() is called from mem_cgroup_init(). But at this
> point, we cannot call alloc_bootmem().
> (and this caused panic at boot.)
>
> This patch moves page_cgroup_init() to init/main.c.
>
> Time table is following:
> ==
> parse_args(). # we can trust mem_cgroup_subsys.disabled bit after this.
> ....
> cgroup_init_early() # "early" init of cgroup.
> ....
> setup_arch() # memmap is allocated.
> ...
> page_cgroup_init();
> mem_init(); # we cannot call alloc_bootmem after this.
> ....
> cgroup_init() # mem_cgroup is initialized.
> ==
>
> Before page_cgroup_init(), mem_map must be initialized. So,
> I added page_cgroup_init() to init/main.c directly.
>
> (*) maybe this is not very clean but
> - cgroup_init_early() is too early
> - in cgroup_init(), we have to use vmalloc instead of alloc_bootmem().
> use of vmalloc area in x86-32 is important and we should avoid very large
> vmalloc() in x86-32. So, we want to use alloc_bootmem() and added page_cgroup_init()
> directly to init/main.c
>
> Acked-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Tested-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
>
> init/main.c | 2 ++
> mm/memcontrol.c | 1 -
> mm/page_cgroup.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/init/main.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/init/main.c
> +++ linux-2.6/init/main.c
> @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@
> #include <linux/signal.h>
> #include <linux/idr.h>
> #include <linux/ftrace.h>
> +#include <linux/page_cgroup.h>
>
> #include <asm/io.h>
> #include <asm/bugs.h>
> @@ -647,6 +648,7 @@ asmlinkage void __init start_kernel(void
> vmalloc_init();
> vfs_caches_init_early();
> cpuset_init_early();
> + page_cgroup_init();
> mem_init();
> enable_debug_pagealloc();
> cpu_hotplug_init();
> Index: linux-2.6/mm/memcontrol.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ linux-2.6/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -1088,7 +1088,6 @@ mem_cgroup_create(struct cgroup_subsys *
> int node;
>
> if (unlikely((cont->parent) == NULL)) {
> - page_cgroup_init();
> mem = &init_mem_cgroup;
> } else {
> mem = mem_cgroup_alloc();
> Index: linux-2.6/mm/page_cgroup.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/mm/page_cgroup.c
> +++ linux-2.6/mm/page_cgroup.c
> @@ -4,7 +4,12 @@
> #include <linux/bit_spinlock.h>
> #include <linux/page_cgroup.h>
> #include <linux/hash.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/memory.h>
> +#include <linux/cgroup.h>
> +
> +extern struct cgroup_subsys mem_cgroup_subsys;
no no bad! evil! unclean!
Didn't the linux/cgroup.h -> linux/cgroup_subsys..h inclusion already
declare this for us?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH][BUGFIX] memcg: fix page_cgroup allocation
2008-10-22 1:37 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2008-10-22 1:42 ` Li Zefan
2008-10-22 1:42 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Li Zefan @ 2008-10-22 1:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, linux-kernel, linux-mm, balbir, mingo, nishimura
>> --- linux-2.6.orig/mm/page_cgroup.c
>> +++ linux-2.6/mm/page_cgroup.c
>> @@ -4,7 +4,12 @@
>> #include <linux/bit_spinlock.h>
>> #include <linux/page_cgroup.h>
>> #include <linux/hash.h>
>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>> #include <linux/memory.h>
>> +#include <linux/cgroup.h>
>> +
>> +extern struct cgroup_subsys mem_cgroup_subsys;
>
> no no bad! evil! unclean!
>
> Didn't the linux/cgroup.h -> linux/cgroup_subsys..h inclusion already
> declare this for us?
>
Yes, I think just include <linux/cgroup.h> is enough.
#define SUBSYS(_x) extern struct cgroup_subsys _x ## _subsys;
#include <linux/cgroup_subsys.h>
#undef SUBSYS
and will be expanded to:
extern struct cgroup_subsys cpu_subsys;
extern struct cgroup_subsys cpuset_subsys;
extern struct cgroup_subsys memory_cgroup_subsys;
...
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH][BUGFIX] memcg: fix page_cgroup allocation
2008-10-22 1:37 ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-22 1:42 ` Li Zefan
@ 2008-10-22 1:42 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki @ 2008-10-22 1:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, balbir, mingo, lizf, nishimura
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:37:38 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> Didn't the linux/cgroup.h -> linux/cgroup_subsys..h inclusion already
> declare this for us?
>
you're right, I'm wrong. fixed one is here. (confirmed by make mm/page_cgroup.i)
Regards,
-Kame
==
page_cgroup_init() is called from mem_cgroup_init(). But at this
point, we cannot call alloc_bootmem().
(and this caused panic at boot.)
This patch moves page_cgroup_init() to init/main.c.
Time table is following:
==
parse_args(). # we can trust mem_cgroup_subsys.disabled bit after this.
....
cgroup_init_early() # "early" init of cgroup.
....
setup_arch() # memmap is allocated.
...
page_cgroup_init();
mem_init(); # we cannot call alloc_bootmem after this.
....
cgroup_init() # mem_cgroup is initialized.
==
Before page_cgroup_init(), mem_map must be initialized. So,
I added page_cgroup_init() to init/main.c directly.
(*) maybe this is not very clean but cgroup_init_early() is too early
and we have to use vmalloc instead of alloc_bootmem() in cgroup_init().
usage of vmalloc area in x86-32 is important and we should avoid
vmalloc() in x86-32. So, we want to use alloc_bootmem() from
sutaible place.
Acked-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
init/main.c | 2 ++
mm/memcontrol.c | 1 -
mm/page_cgroup.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/init/main.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/init/main.c
+++ linux-2.6/init/main.c
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@
#include <linux/signal.h>
#include <linux/idr.h>
#include <linux/ftrace.h>
+#include <linux/page_cgroup.h>
#include <asm/io.h>
#include <asm/bugs.h>
@@ -647,6 +648,7 @@ asmlinkage void __init start_kernel(void
vmalloc_init();
vfs_caches_init_early();
cpuset_init_early();
+ page_cgroup_init();
mem_init();
enable_debug_pagealloc();
cpu_hotplug_init();
Index: linux-2.6/mm/memcontrol.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ linux-2.6/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1088,7 +1088,6 @@ mem_cgroup_create(struct cgroup_subsys *
int node;
if (unlikely((cont->parent) == NULL)) {
- page_cgroup_init();
mem = &init_mem_cgroup;
} else {
mem = mem_cgroup_alloc();
Index: linux-2.6/mm/page_cgroup.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/page_cgroup.c
+++ linux-2.6/mm/page_cgroup.c
@@ -4,7 +4,10 @@
#include <linux/bit_spinlock.h>
#include <linux/page_cgroup.h>
#include <linux/hash.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/memory.h>
+#include <linux/cgroup.h>
+
static void __meminit
__init_page_cgroup(struct page_cgroup *pc, unsigned long pfn)
@@ -66,6 +69,9 @@ void __init page_cgroup_init(void)
int nid, fail;
+ if (mem_cgroup_subsys.disabled)
+ return;
+
for_each_online_node(nid) {
fail = alloc_node_page_cgroup(nid);
if (fail)
@@ -106,9 +112,14 @@ int __meminit init_section_page_cgroup(u
nid = page_to_nid(pfn_to_page(pfn));
table_size = sizeof(struct page_cgroup) * PAGES_PER_SECTION;
- base = kmalloc_node(table_size, GFP_KERNEL, nid);
- if (!base)
- base = vmalloc_node(table_size, nid);
+ if (slab_is_available()) {
+ base = kmalloc_node(table_size, GFP_KERNEL, nid);
+ if (!base)
+ base = vmalloc_node(table_size, nid);
+ } else {
+ base = __alloc_bootmem_node_nopanic(NODE_DATA(nid), table_size,
+ PAGE_SIZE, __pa(MAX_DMA_ADDRESS));
+ }
if (!base) {
printk(KERN_ERR "page cgroup allocation failure\n");
@@ -135,11 +146,16 @@ void __free_page_cgroup(unsigned long pf
if (!ms || !ms->page_cgroup)
return;
base = ms->page_cgroup + pfn;
- ms->page_cgroup = NULL;
- if (is_vmalloc_addr(base))
+ if (is_vmalloc_addr(base)) {
vfree(base);
- else
- kfree(base);
+ ms->page_cgroup = NULL;
+ } else {
+ struct page *page = virt_to_page(base);
+ if (!PageReserved(page)) { /* Is bootmem ? */
+ kfree(base);
+ ms->page_cgroup = NULL;
+ }
+ }
}
int online_page_cgroup(unsigned long start_pfn,
@@ -213,6 +229,9 @@ void __init page_cgroup_init(void)
unsigned long pfn;
int fail = 0;
+ if (mem_cgroup_subsys.disabled)
+ return;
+
for (pfn = 0; !fail && pfn < max_pfn; pfn += PAGES_PER_SECTION) {
if (!pfn_present(pfn))
continue;
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-10-22 1:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-10-22 1:24 [PATCH][BUGFIX] memcg: fix page_cgroup allocation KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-10-22 1:37 ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-22 1:42 ` Li Zefan
2008-10-22 1:42 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox