From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] mm: fix anon_vma races
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 04:54:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081019025444.GC16562@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081018184405.GA26184@parisc-linux.org>
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 12:44:05PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 10:00:30AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > Apparently pairwise ordering is more interesting than just a theoretical
> > > thing, and not just restricted to Alpha's funny caches.
> >
> > Nobody does just pairwise ordering, afaik. It's an insane model. Everybody
> > does some form of transitive ordering.
>
> I assume you're talking about CPUs in particular here, and I don't know
> of any counterexamples.
Yes, just CPUs.
> If you're talking about PCI devices, the model is not transitive.
> Here's the exact text from Appendix E of PCI 3.0:
>
> A system may have multiple Producer-Consumer pairs operating
> simultaneously, with different data - flag-status sets located all
> around the system. But since only one Producer can write to a single
> data-flag set, there are no ordering requirements between different
> masters. Writes from one master on one bus may occur in one order on
> one bus, with respect to another master's writes, and occur in another
> order on another bus. In this case, the rules allow for some writes
> to be rearranged; for example, an agent on Bus 1 may see Transaction
> A from a master on Bus 1 complete first, followed by Transaction B
> from another master on Bus 0. An agent on Bus 0 may see Transaction
> B complete first followed by Transaction A. Even though the actual
> transactions complete in a different order, this causes no problem
> since the different masters must be addressing different data-flag sets.
>
> I seem to remember earlier versions of the spec having more clear
> language about A happening before B and B happening before C didn't
> mean that A happened before C from the perspective of a third device,
> but I can't find it right now.
>
> Anyway, as the spec says, you're not supposed to use PCI like that,
> so it doesn't matter.
Interesting. Hopefully as you say it won't matter.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-19 2:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-16 4:10 Nick Piggin
2008-10-17 22:14 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-10-17 23:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-10-18 0:13 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-10-18 0:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-10-18 1:53 ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-18 2:50 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-10-18 2:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-10-18 5:49 ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-18 10:49 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-10-18 17:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-10-18 18:44 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-10-19 2:54 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2008-10-19 2:53 ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-17 23:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-17 23:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-10-18 0:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-10-18 1:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-10-18 1:32 ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-18 2:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-10-18 2:25 ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-18 2:35 ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-18 2:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-10-18 5:20 ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-18 10:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-19 9:52 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-10-19 10:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-19 12:39 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-10-19 18:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-10-19 18:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-19 19:00 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-10-20 4:03 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-10-20 15:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-10-20 18:21 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-10-21 2:56 ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-21 3:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-10-21 4:33 ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-21 12:58 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-10-21 15:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-10-22 9:29 ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-21 4:34 ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-21 13:55 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-10-21 2:44 ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-18 19:14 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-10-19 3:03 ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-19 7:07 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-10-20 3:26 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-10-21 2:45 ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-19 1:13 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-10-19 2:41 ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-19 9:45 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-10-21 3:59 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081019025444.GC16562@wotan.suse.de \
--to=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox