linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@gmail.com>
To: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	cmm@us.ibm.com, tytso@mit.edu, sandeen@redhat.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, hch@infradead.org, steve@chygwyn.com,
	npiggin@suse.de, mpatocka@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH updated] ext4: Fix file fragmentation during large file write.
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:43:53 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081016111353.GB3354@skywalker> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081016091015.GA3354@skywalker>

On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 02:40:15PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 07:51:32PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 16:41 -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 23:32 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > > > The range_cyclic writeback mode use the address_space
> > > > writeback_index as the start index for writeback. With
> > > > delayed allocation we were updating writeback_index
> > > > wrongly resulting in highly fragmented file. Number of
> > > > extents reduced from 4000 to 27 for a 3GB file with
> > > > the below patch.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > I tested the ext4 patch queue from today on top of 2.6.27, and this
> > > includes Aneesh's latest patches.
> > > 
> > > Things are going at disk speed for streaming writes, with the number of
> > > extents generated for a 32GB file down to 27.  So, this is definitely an
> > > improvement for ext4.
> > 
> > Just FYI, I ran this with compilebench -i 20 --makej and my log is full
> > of these:
> > 
> > ext4_da_writepages: jbd2_start: 1024 pages, ino 520417; err -30
> > Pid: 4072, comm: pdflush Not tainted 2.6.27 #2
> > 
> 

compilebench numbers

ext4
==========================================================================
intial create total runs 20 avg 30.25 MB/s (user 0.74s sys 2.40s)
no runs for create
no runs for patch
compile total runs 20 avg 39.79 MB/s (user 0.17s sys 2.55s)
no runs for clean
no runs for read tree
read compiled tree total runs 3 avg 19.83 MB/s (user 0.97s sys 4.08s)
no runs for delete tree
delete compiled tree total runs 20 avg 4.42 seconds (user 0.58s sys 1.79s)
no runs for stat tree

ext3
======================
intial create total runs 20 avg 27.96 MB/s (user 0.73s sys 2.57s)
no runs for create
no runs for patch
compile total runs 20 avg 28.84 MB/s (user 0.17s sys 4.03s)
no runs for clean
no runs for read tree
read compiled tree total runs 3 avg 19.46 MB/s (user 0.97s sys 4.13s)
no runs for delete tree
delete compiled tree total runs 20 avg 18.09 seconds (user 0.58s sys 1.61s)
no runs for stat tree
no runs for stat compiled tree

-aneesh

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-16 11:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-10 18:02 Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-10-10 18:12 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-10-10 18:12 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-10-10 19:15 ` Chris Mason
2008-10-11 10:51 ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-11 18:14   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-10-11 19:07     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-10-15 20:41 ` Chris Mason
2008-10-15 23:51   ` Chris Mason
2008-10-16  2:41     ` Theodore Tso
2008-10-16  2:44     ` Andreas Dilger
2008-10-16  7:50     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-10-16  9:10     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-10-16 11:13       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2008-10-10 18:02 Aneesh Kumar K.V

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081016111353.GB3354@skywalker \
    --to=aneesh.kumar@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=steve@chygwyn.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox