From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 13:50:52 +0200 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] shmat: introduce flag SHM_MAP_HINT Message-ID: <20081007115052.GI20740@one.firstfloor.org> References: <20081007195837.5A6B.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> <20081007112119.GG20740@one.firstfloor.org> <20081007202127.5A74.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> <20081007113050.GD5126@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081007113050.GD5126@localhost.localdomain> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro , Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Ingo Molnar , Arjan van de Ven , Andrew Morton List-ID: On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 02:30:51PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 08:26:03PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > > > > Honestly, I don't like that qemu specific feature insert into shmem core. > > > > > > I wouldn't say it's a qemu specific interface. While qemu would > > > be the first user I would expect more in the future. It's a pretty > > > obvious extension. In fact it nearly should be default, if the > > > risk of breaking old applications wasn't too high. > > > > hm, ok, i understand your intension. > > however, I think following code isn't self describing. > > > > addr = shmat(shmid, addr, SHM_MAP_HINT); > > > > because HINT is too generic word. > > I think we should find better word. > > > > SHM_MAP_NO_FIXED ? > > I like it. > Andi? SHM_MAP_NOT_FIXED perhaps. I personally would call it SHM_MAP_SEARCH_HINT But to be honest I have no strong opinion on the naming. Perhaps others have. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org