From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Piggin Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/32] Swap over NFS - v19 Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 16:53:39 +1000 References: <20081002130504.927878499@chello.nl> <20081002124748.638c95ff.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20081002124748.638c95ff.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200810031653.39639.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andrew Morton Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, Daniel Lezcano , Pekka Enberg , Neil Brown , David Miller List-ID: On Friday 03 October 2008 05:47, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:05:04 +0200 Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Let's get this ball rolling... > > I don't think we're really able to get any MM balls rolling until we > get all the split-LRU stuff landed. Is anyone testing it? Is it good? Peter's patches are very orthogonal to that work and shouldn't actually change those kinds of reclaim heuristics at all. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org