Re: PTE access rules & abstraction

[Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>]

On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 03:35:06PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 20:16 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > 
> > To a certain extent this is what BSD does in it's pmap layer, except
> > that they don't have the page table datastructure abstraction like
> > Linus does in the generic code, and which I think was a smart design
> > decision on our side.
> > 
> > All of the pmap modules in BSD are pretty big and duplicate a lot of
> > code that arch's don't have to be mindful about under Linux.
> 
> I definitely agree, I don't think we want to go away from the page table
> as being the abstraction :-) But I'm wondering if we can do a little bit
> better with the accessors to those page tables.
> 
> BTW. am I the only one to have got one copy of David's reply (that I'm
> quoting) coming with a From: Nick Piggin in the headers ? (apparently
> coming from kvack).

No. I see that, and so does marc.

http://marc.info/?t=122184627700007&r=1&w=2

And I've only ever seen it from Dave on kvack.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>