Re: [RFC PATCH] discarding swap

[Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>]

On Tue, Sep 09 2008, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> Hi David,
> 
> I notice 2.6.27-rc5-mm1 and next trees include "discard" support,
> so far being used only by fat.  Is that really intended for 2.6.28?
> 
> Here's a proposed patch to use discard on swap.  But I know nothing of
> the tradeoffs, nor what really goes on in such a device, and have none
> to try, so this patch may be wide of the mark.
> 
> I started off with the discard_swap() in sys_swapon(): it seemed obvious
> to discard all the old swap contents (except the swap header) at that
> point (though it would be unfortunate if someone mistakenly does a fresh
> boot of a kernel when they mean to resume from swap disk: discarding
> would remove the option to back out before swap gets written).

I like the idea, it's certainly within the expected use of this.

> But I've no idea how long that is liable to take on a device which really
> supports discard: discarding an entire partition all at once sounds good
> for giving the device the greatest freedom to reorganize itself,
> but would that happen quickly enough?

That, I think, is still something that we will have to wait and see! I
don't know what the timings on this are, presumably the device firmware
could go about its business in the background and let the command
complete quickly. There's a lot of background stuff in the first place,
so I'd be surprised if it wasn't quick. If it's meant for fs usage, it
needs to be quick as well.

> To do that (and to avoid duplicating the same loop within swapfile.c),
> I'd like to change the nr_sects argument to blkdev_issue_discard() from
> unsigned to sector_t - unsigned long would be large enough for swap, but
> sector_t makes more general sense.  And if that change is made, it's
> probably right to change sb_issue_discard()'s nr_sects to match?

I guess that is needed, if we are going to pass the full device sizes in
there. So fine with me.

> I also got worried that blkdev_issue_discard() might get stuck in its
> loop for a very long time, requests getting freed from the queue before
> it quite fills up: so inserted an occasional cond_resched().

Needs experimentation, but yes I agree with the notion of sprinkling
some cond_resched()'s in there.

> It seems odd to me that the data-less blkdev_issue_discard() is limited
> at all by max_hw_sectors; but I'm guessing there's a good reason, safety
> perhaps, which has forced you to that.

The discard request needs to be turned into a hw command at some point,
and for that we still need to fit the offset and size in there. So we
are still limited by 32MB commands on sata w/lba48, even though we are
not moving any data. Suboptimal, but...

> Where else should swap be discarded?  I don't want to add anything into
> the swap freeing path, and the locking there would be problematic.  And
> I take it that doing a discard of each single page just before rewriting
> it would just be a totally pointless waste of time.
> 
> But the swap allocation algorithm in scan_swap_map() does already try
> to locate a free cluster of swap pages (256 of them, not tunable today
> but could easily be: 1MB on x86).  So I think it makes sense to discard
> the old swap when we find a free cluster (and forget about discarding
> when we don't find one).  That's what I've implemented - but then,
> does it still make any sense also to discard all of swap at swapon?

I think so - it's akin to mkfs doing a full discard before making the
file system, yet the file system should also notify the device when it
frees a block. It's a balance of course, don't do it if you are
immediately using the block again.

> I think that discarding when allocating swap cannot safely use GFP_KERNEL
> for its bio_alloc()s: swap_writepage() uses GFP_NOIO, so should be good.
> That involves an added gfp_t arg to blkdev_issue_discard() - unless I
> copy it to make a swap_issue_discard(), which seems a bad idea.

Agree, you need GFP_NOIO there. So the patch to pass in the gfp_t is
just fine, in fact anything but the ioctl path does need that.

> Here's the proposed patch, or combination of patches: the blkdev and
> swap parts should certainly be separated.  Advice welcome - thanks!

I'll snatch up the blk bits and put them in for-2.6.28. OK if I add your
SOB to that?


> 
> Not-yet-Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
> ---
> 
>  block/blk-barrier.c    |   11 +-
>  include/linux/blkdev.h |    9 +-
>  include/linux/swap.h   |   15 ++-
>  mm/swapfile.c          |  168 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  4 files changed, 183 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> --- 2.6.27-rc5-mm1/block/blk-barrier.c	2008-09-05 10:05:33.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux/block/blk-barrier.c	2008-09-09 20:00:26.000000000 +0100
> @@ -332,15 +332,17 @@ static void blkdev_discard_end_io(struct
>   * @bdev:	blockdev to issue discard for
>   * @sector:	start sector
>   * @nr_sects:	number of sectors to discard
> + * @gfp_mask:	memory allocation flags (for bio_alloc)
>   *
>   * Description:
>   *    Issue a discard request for the sectors in question. Does not wait.
>   */
> -int blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
> -			 unsigned nr_sects)
> +int blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev,
> +			 sector_t sector, sector_t nr_sects, gfp_t gfp_mask)
>  {
>  	struct request_queue *q;
>  	struct bio *bio;
> +	unsigned int iters = 0;
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
>  	if (bdev->bd_disk == NULL)
> @@ -354,7 +356,10 @@ int blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_de
>  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  
>  	while (nr_sects && !ret) {
> -		bio = bio_alloc(GFP_KERNEL, 0);
> +		if ((++iters & 7) == 0)
> +			cond_resched();
> +
> +		bio = bio_alloc(gfp_mask, 0);
>  		if (!bio)
>  			return -ENOMEM;
>  
> --- 2.6.27-rc5-mm1/include/linux/blkdev.h	2008-09-05 10:05:51.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux/include/linux/blkdev.h	2008-09-09 20:00:26.000000000 +0100
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>  #include <linux/bio.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/stringify.h>
> +#include <linux/gfp.h>
>  #include <linux/bsg.h>
>  #include <linux/smp.h>
>  
> @@ -875,15 +876,15 @@ static inline struct request *blk_map_qu
>  }
>  
>  extern int blkdev_issue_flush(struct block_device *, sector_t *);
> -extern int blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *, sector_t sector,
> -				unsigned nr_sects);
> +extern int blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *,
> +				sector_t sector, sector_t nr_sects, gfp_t);
>  
>  static inline int sb_issue_discard(struct super_block *sb,
> -				   sector_t block, unsigned nr_blocks)
> +				   sector_t block, sector_t nr_blocks)
>  {
>  	block <<= (sb->s_blocksize_bits - 9);
>  	nr_blocks <<= (sb->s_blocksize_bits - 9);
> -	return blkdev_issue_discard(sb->s_bdev, block, nr_blocks);
> +	return blkdev_issue_discard(sb->s_bdev, block, nr_blocks, GFP_KERNEL);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> --- 2.6.27-rc5-mm1/include/linux/swap.h	2008-09-05 10:05:52.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux/include/linux/swap.h	2008-09-09 20:00:26.000000000 +0100
> @@ -119,8 +119,9 @@ struct swap_extent {
>  
>  enum {
>  	SWP_USED	= (1 << 0),	/* is slot in swap_info[] used? */
> -	SWP_WRITEOK	= (1 << 1),	/* ok to write to this swap?	*/
> -	SWP_ACTIVE	= (SWP_USED | SWP_WRITEOK),
> +	SWP_WRITEOK	= (1 << 1),	/* ok to write to this swap? */
> +	SWP_DISCARDABLE = (1 << 2),	/* blkdev supports discard */
> +	SWP_DISCARDING	= (1 << 3),	/* now discarding a free cluster */
>  					/* add others here before... */
>  	SWP_SCANNING	= (1 << 8),	/* refcount in scan_swap_map */
>  };
> @@ -134,22 +135,24 @@ enum {
>   * The in-memory structure used to track swap areas.
>   */
>  struct swap_info_struct {
> -	unsigned int flags;
> +	unsigned long flags;
>  	int prio;			/* swap priority */
> +	int next;			/* next entry on swap list */
>  	struct file *swap_file;
>  	struct block_device *bdev;
>  	struct list_head extent_list;
>  	struct swap_extent *curr_swap_extent;
> -	unsigned old_block_size;
> -	unsigned short * swap_map;
> +	unsigned short *swap_map;
>  	unsigned int lowest_bit;
>  	unsigned int highest_bit;
> +	unsigned int lowest_alloc;
> +	unsigned int highest_alloc;
>  	unsigned int cluster_next;
>  	unsigned int cluster_nr;
>  	unsigned int pages;
>  	unsigned int max;
>  	unsigned int inuse_pages;
> -	int next;			/* next entry on swap list */
> +	unsigned int old_block_size;
>  };
>  
>  struct swap_list_t {
> --- 2.6.27-rc5-mm1/mm/swapfile.c	2008-09-05 10:05:54.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux/mm/swapfile.c	2008-09-09 20:00:26.000000000 +0100
> @@ -83,13 +83,93 @@ void swap_unplug_io_fn(struct backing_de
>  	up_read(&swap_unplug_sem);
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * swapon tell device that all the old swap contents can be discarded,
> + * to allow the swap device to optimize its wear-levelling.
> + */
> +static int discard_swap(struct swap_info_struct *si)
> +{
> +	struct swap_extent *se;
> +	int err = 0;
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry(se, &si->extent_list, list) {
> +		sector_t start_block = se->start_block << (PAGE_SHIFT - 9);
> +		pgoff_t nr_blocks = se->nr_pages << (PAGE_SHIFT - 9);
> +
> +		if (se->start_page == 0) {
> +			/* Do not discard the swap header page! */
> +			start_block += 1 << (PAGE_SHIFT - 9);
> +			nr_blocks -= 1 << (PAGE_SHIFT - 9);
> +			if (!nr_blocks)
> +				continue;
> +		}
> +
> +		err = blkdev_issue_discard(si->bdev, start_block,
> +						nr_blocks, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (err)
> +			break;
> +
> +		cond_resched();
> +	}
> +	return err;		/* That will often be -EOPNOTSUPP */
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * swap allocation tell device that a cluster of swap can now be discarded,
> + * to allow the swap device to optimize its wear-levelling.
> + */
> +static void discard_swap_cluster(struct swap_info_struct *si,
> +				 pgoff_t start_page, pgoff_t nr_pages)
> +{
> +	struct swap_extent *se = si->curr_swap_extent;
> +	int found_extent = 0;
> +
> +	while (nr_pages) {
> +		struct list_head *lh;
> +
> +		if (se->start_page <= start_page &&
> +		    start_page < se->start_page + se->nr_pages) {
> +			pgoff_t offset = start_page - se->start_page;
> +			sector_t start_block = se->start_block + offset;
> +			pgoff_t nr_blocks = se->nr_pages - offset;
> +
> +			if (nr_blocks > nr_pages)
> +				nr_blocks = nr_pages;
> +			start_page += nr_blocks;
> +			nr_pages -= nr_blocks;
> +
> +			if (!found_extent++)
> +				si->curr_swap_extent = se;
> +
> +			start_block <<= PAGE_SHIFT - 9;
> +			nr_blocks <<= PAGE_SHIFT - 9;
> +			if (blkdev_issue_discard(si->bdev, start_block,
> +							nr_blocks, GFP_NOIO))
> +				break;
> +		}
> +
> +		lh = se->list.next;
> +		if (lh == &si->extent_list)
> +			lh = lh->next;
> +		se = list_entry(lh, struct swap_extent, list);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static int wait_for_discard(void *word)
> +{
> +	schedule();
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  #define SWAPFILE_CLUSTER	256
>  #define LATENCY_LIMIT		256
>  
>  static inline unsigned long scan_swap_map(struct swap_info_struct *si)
>  {
> -	unsigned long offset, last_in_cluster;
> +	unsigned long offset;
> +	unsigned long last_in_cluster = 0;
>  	int latency_ration = LATENCY_LIMIT;
> +	int found_free_cluster = 0;
>  
>  	/* 
>  	 * We try to cluster swap pages by allocating them sequentially
> @@ -102,10 +182,24 @@ static inline unsigned long scan_swap_ma
>  	 */
>  
>  	si->flags += SWP_SCANNING;
> -	if (unlikely(!si->cluster_nr)) {
> -		si->cluster_nr = SWAPFILE_CLUSTER - 1;
> -		if (si->pages - si->inuse_pages < SWAPFILE_CLUSTER)
> +	if (unlikely(!si->cluster_nr--)) {
> +		if (si->pages - si->inuse_pages < SWAPFILE_CLUSTER) {
> +			si->cluster_nr = SWAPFILE_CLUSTER - 1;
>  			goto lowest;
> +		}
> +		if (si->flags & SWP_DISCARDABLE) {
> +			/*
> +			 * Start range check on racing allocations, in case
> +			 * they overlap the cluster we eventually decide on
> +			 * (we scan without swap_lock to allow preemption).
> +			 * It's hardly conceivable that cluster_nr could be
> +			 * wrapped during our scan, but don't depend on it.
> +			 */
> +			if (si->lowest_alloc)
> +				goto lowest;
> +			si->lowest_alloc = si->max;
> +			si->highest_alloc = 0;
> +		}
>  		spin_unlock(&swap_lock);
>  
>  		offset = si->lowest_bit;
> @@ -118,6 +212,8 @@ static inline unsigned long scan_swap_ma
>  			else if (offset == last_in_cluster) {
>  				spin_lock(&swap_lock);
>  				si->cluster_next = offset-SWAPFILE_CLUSTER+1;
> +				si->cluster_nr = SWAPFILE_CLUSTER - 1;
> +				found_free_cluster = 1;
>  				goto cluster;
>  			}
>  			if (unlikely(--latency_ration < 0)) {
> @@ -125,11 +221,13 @@ static inline unsigned long scan_swap_ma
>  				latency_ration = LATENCY_LIMIT;
>  			}
>  		}
> +
>  		spin_lock(&swap_lock);
> +		si->cluster_nr = SWAPFILE_CLUSTER - 1;
> +		si->lowest_alloc = 0;
>  		goto lowest;
>  	}
>  
> -	si->cluster_nr--;
>  cluster:
>  	offset = si->cluster_next;
>  	if (offset > si->highest_bit)
> @@ -151,6 +249,60 @@ checks:	if (!(si->flags & SWP_WRITEOK))
>  		si->swap_map[offset] = 1;
>  		si->cluster_next = offset + 1;
>  		si->flags -= SWP_SCANNING;
> +
> +		if (si->lowest_alloc) {
> +			/*
> +			 * Only set when SWP_DISCARDABLE, and there's a scan
> +			 * for a free cluster in progress or just completed.
> +			 */
> +			if (found_free_cluster) {
> +				/*
> +				 * To optimize wear-levelling, discard the
> +				 * old data of the cluster, taking care not to
> +				 * discard any of its pages that have already
> +				 * been allocated by racing tasks (offset has
> +				 * already stepped over any at the beginning).
> +				 */
> +				if (offset < si->highest_alloc &&
> +				    si->lowest_alloc <= last_in_cluster)
> +					last_in_cluster = si->lowest_alloc - 1;
> +				si->flags |= SWP_DISCARDING;
> +				spin_unlock(&swap_lock);
> +
> +				if (offset < last_in_cluster)
> +					discard_swap_cluster(si, offset,
> +						last_in_cluster - offset + 1);
> +
> +				spin_lock(&swap_lock);
> +				si->lowest_alloc = 0;
> +				si->flags &= ~SWP_DISCARDING;
> +
> +				smp_mb();	/* wake_up_bit advises this */
> +				wake_up_bit(&si->flags, ilog2(SWP_DISCARDING));
> +
> +			} else if (si->flags & SWP_DISCARDING) {
> +				/*
> +				 * Delay using pages allocated by racing tasks
> +				 * until the whole discard has been issued. We
> +				 * could defer that delay until swap_writepage,
> +				 * but it's easier to keep this self-contained.
> +				 */
> +				spin_unlock(&swap_lock);
> +				wait_on_bit(&si->flags, ilog2(SWP_DISCARDING),
> +					wait_for_discard, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> +				spin_lock(&swap_lock);
> +			} else {
> +				/*
> +				 * Note pages allocated by racing tasks while
> +				 * scan for a free cluster is in progress, so
> +				 * that its final discard can exclude them.
> +				 */
> +				if (offset < si->lowest_alloc)
> +					si->lowest_alloc = offset;
> +				if (offset > si->highest_alloc)
> +					si->highest_alloc = offset;
> +			}
> +		}
>  		return offset;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -1253,7 +1405,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_swapoff(const char _
>  	spin_lock(&swap_lock);
>  	for (type = swap_list.head; type >= 0; type = swap_info[type].next) {
>  		p = swap_info + type;
> -		if ((p->flags & SWP_ACTIVE) == SWP_ACTIVE) {
> +		if (p->flags & SWP_WRITEOK) {
>  			if (p->swap_file->f_mapping == mapping)
>  				break;
>  		}
> @@ -1687,6 +1839,8 @@ asmlinkage long sys_swapon(const char __
>  		error = -EINVAL;
>  		goto bad_swap;
>  	}
> +	if (discard_swap(p) == 0)
> +		p->flags |= SWP_DISCARDABLE;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&swapon_mutex);
>  	spin_lock(&swap_lock);
> @@ -1696,7 +1850,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_swapon(const char __
>  	else
>  		p->prio = --least_priority;
>  	p->swap_map = swap_map;
> -	p->flags = SWP_ACTIVE;
> +	p->flags |= SWP_WRITEOK;
>  	nr_swap_pages += nr_good_pages;
>  	total_swap_pages += nr_good_pages;
>  

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>