From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
hugh@veritas.com, menage@google.com, xemul@openvz.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Remove cgroup member from struct page
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 13:58:27 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200809091358.28350.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080909125751.37042345.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Tuesday 09 September 2008 13:57, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 20:58:10 +0530
>
> Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > Sorry for the delay in sending out the new patch, I am traveling and
> > thus a little less responsive. Here is the update patch
>
> Hmm.. I've considered this approach for a while and my answer is that
> this is not what you really want.
>
> Because you just moves the placement of pointer from memmap to
> radix_tree both in GFP_KERNEL, total kernel memory usage is not changed.
> So, at least, you have to add some address calculation (as I did in March)
> to getting address of page_cgroup. But page_cgroup itself consumes 32bytes
> per page. Then.....
Just keep in mind that an important point is to make it more attractive
to configure cgroup into the kernel, but have it disabled or unused at
runtime.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-09 3:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-31 17:47 Balbir Singh
2008-09-01 0:01 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-01 3:28 ` Balbir Singh
2008-09-01 4:03 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-01 5:17 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-01 6:16 ` Balbir Singh
2008-09-01 6:09 ` Balbir Singh
2008-09-01 6:24 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-01 6:25 ` Balbir Singh
2008-09-01 6:59 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-01 6:56 ` Nick Piggin
2008-09-01 7:17 ` Balbir Singh
2008-09-01 7:19 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-01 7:43 ` Nick Piggin
2008-09-02 9:24 ` Balbir Singh
2008-09-02 10:02 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-02 9:58 ` Balbir Singh
2008-09-02 10:07 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-02 10:12 ` Balbir Singh
2008-09-02 10:57 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-02 12:37 ` Balbir Singh
2008-09-03 3:33 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-03 7:31 ` Balbir Singh
2008-09-08 15:28 ` Balbir Singh
2008-09-09 3:57 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-09 3:58 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2008-09-09 4:53 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-09 5:00 ` Nick Piggin
2008-09-09 5:12 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-09 12:24 ` Balbir Singh
2008-09-09 12:28 ` Nick Piggin
2008-09-09 12:30 ` kamezawa.hiroyu
2008-09-09 12:34 ` Balbir Singh
2008-09-10 1:20 ` [Approach #2] " Balbir Singh
2008-09-10 1:49 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-10 2:11 ` Balbir Singh
2008-09-10 2:35 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-10 20:44 ` Nick Piggin
2008-09-10 11:03 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-10 21:02 ` Nick Piggin
2008-09-10 11:27 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-10 14:34 ` Balbir Singh
2008-09-10 22:21 ` Dave Hansen
2008-09-10 22:31 ` David Miller, Dave Hansen
2008-09-10 22:36 ` Balbir Singh
2008-09-10 22:56 ` Dave Hansen
2008-09-11 1:35 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-11 1:47 ` Balbir Singh
2008-09-11 1:56 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-17 23:28 ` [RFC][PATCH] Remove cgroup member from struct page (v3) Balbir Singh
2008-09-18 1:40 ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-18 3:57 ` Balbir Singh
2008-09-18 5:00 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-18 4:26 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2008-09-18 4:50 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-18 6:13 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2008-09-18 4:43 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-18 4:58 ` Balbir Singh
2008-09-18 5:15 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-18 11:01 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-18 23:56 ` Balbir Singh
2008-09-19 0:37 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-10 22:38 ` [Approach #2] [RFC][PATCH] Remove cgroup member from struct page Nick Piggin
2008-09-09 4:18 ` Balbir Singh
2008-09-09 4:55 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-09 7:37 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-01 2:39 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-01 3:42 ` Balbir Singh
2008-09-01 9:03 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2008-09-01 9:17 ` Balbir Singh
2008-09-01 9:43 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2008-09-01 13:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-02 7:35 ` Balbir Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200809091358.28350.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox