linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
To: MinChan Kim <barrioskmc@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] pull out the page pre-release and sanity check logic for reuse
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 16:14:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080908151413.GB9190@brain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44c63dc40809080711v98f4fdbs19081aa7cb81634d@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 11:11:22PM +0900, MinChan Kim wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 7:19 PM, Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org> wrote:
> > When we are about to release a page we perform a number of actions
> > on that page.  We clear down any anonymous mappings, confirm that
> > the page is safe to release, check for freeing locks, before mapping
> > the page should that be required.  Pull this processing out into a
> > helper function for reuse in a later patch.
> >
> > Note that we do not convert the similar cleardown in free_hot_cold_page()
> > as the optimiser is unable to squash the loops during the inline.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
> > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> > Acked-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  mm/page_alloc.c |   43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> >  1 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > index f52fcf1..b2a2c2b 100644
> > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > @@ -489,6 +489,35 @@ static inline int free_pages_check(struct page *page)
> >  }
> >
> >  /*
> > + * Prepare this page for release to the buddy.  Sanity check the page.
> > + * Returns 1 if the page is safe to free.
> > + */
> > +static inline int free_page_prepare(struct page *page, int order)
> > +{
> > +       int i;
> > +       int reserved = 0;
> > +
> > +       if (PageAnon(page))
> > +               page->mapping = NULL;
> 
> Why do you need to clear down anonymous mapping ?
> I think if you don't convert this cleardown in free_hot_cold_page(),
> you don't need it.
> 
> If you do it, bad_page can't do his role.

Yeah that has slipped through from where originally this patch used to
merge two different instances of this code.  Good spot.  Will sort that
out.

> > +       for (i = 0 ; i < (1 << order) ; ++i)
> > +               reserved += free_pages_check(page + i);
> > +       if (reserved)
> > +               return 0;
> > +
> > +       if (!PageHighMem(page)) { > > +               debug_check_no_locks_freed(page_address(page),
> > +                                                       PAGE_SIZE << order);
> > +               debug_check_no_obj_freed(page_address(page),
> > +                                          PAGE_SIZE << order);
> > +       }
> > +       arch_free_page(page, order);
> > +       kernel_map_pages(page, 1 << order, 0);
> > +
> > +       return 1;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> >  * Frees a list of pages.
> >  * Assumes all pages on list are in same zone, and of same order.
> >  * count is the number of pages to free.
> > @@ -529,22 +558,10 @@ static void free_one_page(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int order)
> >  static void __free_pages_ok(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
> >  {
> >        unsigned long flags;
> > -       int i;
> > -       int reserved = 0;
> >
> > -       for (i = 0 ; i < (1 << order) ; ++i)
> > -               reserved += free_pages_check(page + i);
> > -       if (reserved)
> > +       if (!free_page_prepare(page, order))
> >                return;
> >
> > -       if (!PageHighMem(page)) {
> > -               debug_check_no_locks_freed(page_address(page),PAGE_SIZE<<order);
> > -               debug_check_no_obj_freed(page_address(page),
> > -                                          PAGE_SIZE << order);
> > -       }
> > -       arch_free_page(page, order);
> > -       kernel_map_pages(page, 1 << order, 0);
> > -
> >        local_irq_save(flags);
> >        __count_vm_events(PGFREE, 1 << order);
> >        free_one_page(page_zone(page), page, order);

-apw

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2008-09-08 15:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-05 10:19 [PATCH 0/4] Reclaim page capture v3 Andy Whitcroft
2008-09-05 10:19 ` [PATCH 1/4] pull out the page pre-release and sanity check logic for reuse Andy Whitcroft
2008-09-08 14:11   ` MinChan Kim
2008-09-08 15:14     ` Andy Whitcroft [this message]
2008-09-05 10:20 ` [PATCH 2/4] pull out zone cpuset and watermark checks " Andy Whitcroft
2008-09-05 10:20 ` [PATCH 3/4] buddy: explicitly identify buddy field use in struct page Andy Whitcroft
2008-09-05 10:20 ` [PATCH 4/4] capture pages freed during direct reclaim for allocation by the reclaimer Andy Whitcroft
2008-09-08  6:08 ` [PATCH 0/4] Reclaim page capture v3 Nick Piggin
2008-09-08 11:44   ` Andy Whitcroft
2008-09-08 13:59     ` Nick Piggin
2008-09-08 16:41       ` Andy Whitcroft
2008-09-09  3:31         ` Nick Piggin
2008-09-09 16:35           ` Andy Whitcroft
2008-09-10  3:19             ` Nick Piggin
2008-09-10  6:56               ` Andy Whitcroft
2008-09-12 21:30               ` Andy Whitcroft
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-10-01 12:30 [PATCH 0/4] Reclaim page capture v4 Andy Whitcroft
2008-10-01 12:30 ` [PATCH 1/4] pull out the page pre-release and sanity check logic for reuse Andy Whitcroft
2008-10-02  7:05   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-09-03 18:44 [RFC PATCH 0/4] Reclaim page capture v2 Andy Whitcroft
2008-09-03 18:44 ` [PATCH 1/4] pull out the page pre-release and sanity check logic for reuse Andy Whitcroft
2008-09-04  1:24   ` Rik van Riel
2008-09-05  1:52   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-07-01 17:58 [RFC PATCH 0/4] Reclaim page capture v1 Andy Whitcroft
2008-07-01 17:58 ` [PATCH 1/4] pull out the page pre-release and sanity check logic for reuse Andy Whitcroft

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080908151413.GB9190@brain \
    --to=apw@shadowen.org \
    --cc=barrioskmc@gmail.com \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox