From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.227]) by e32.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m85HdC9h010170 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2008 13:39:12 -0400 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168]) by d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.0) with ESMTP id m85HkWlt164368 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2008 11:46:33 -0600 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m85HkVEC027049 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2008 11:46:32 -0600 Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 10:46:29 -0700 From: Gary Hade Subject: Re: [PATCH] Show memory section to node relationship in sysfs Message-ID: <20080905174629.GD11692@us.ibm.com> References: <20080904202212.GB26795@us.ibm.com> <1220566546.23386.65.camel@nimitz> <20080905010010.GE26795@us.ibm.com> <1220636538.23386.128.camel@nimitz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1220636538.23386.128.camel@nimitz> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Dave Hansen Cc: Gary Hade , linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Yasunori Goto , Badari Pulavarty , Mel Gorman , Chris McDermott , Greg KH List-ID: On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 10:42:18AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 18:00 -0700, Gary Hade wrote: > > > > In any case, the symlink sounds like a good idea and would be > > sufficient by itself but I'm wondering if it would be overkill to > > provide both? e.g. a 'node' symlink and a 'node_num' file. > > Yep, that's overkill. I'd just do the symlink. My later conclusion as well. Thanks. Gary -- Gary Hade System x Enablement IBM Linux Technology Center 503-578-4503 IBM T/L: 775-4503 garyhade@us.ibm.com http://www.ibm.com/linux/ltc -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org