From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 19:07:23 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Remove cgroup member from struct page Message-Id: <20080902190723.841841f0.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <48BD0E4A.5040502@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20080831174756.GA25790@balbir.in.ibm.com> <200809011656.45190.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> <20080901161927.a1fe5afc.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <200809011743.42658.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> <48BD0641.4040705@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20080902190256.1375f593.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <48BD0E4A.5040502@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: Nick Piggin , Andrew Morton , hugh@veritas.com, menage@google.com, xemul@openvz.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 15:28:34 +0530 Balbir Singh wrote: > KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > > On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 14:54:17 +0530 > > Balbir Singh wrote: > > > >> Nick Piggin wrote: > >>> That could be a reasonable solution. Balbir has other concerns about > >>> this... so I think it is OK to try the radix tree approach first. > >> Thanks, Nick! > >> > >> Kamezawa-San, I would like to integrate the radix tree patches after review and > >> some more testing then integrate your patchset on top of it. Do you have any > >> objections/concerns with the suggested approach? > >> > > please show performance number first. > > Yes, that is why said some more testing. I am running lmbench and kernbench on > it and some other tests, I'll get back with numbers. > A test which is not suffer much from I/O is better. And please don't worry about my patches. I'll reschedule if yours goes first. Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org