From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2008 15:24:24 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Remove cgroup member from struct page Message-Id: <20080901152424.d9adfe47.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <48BB8716.5090805@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20080831174756.GA25790@balbir.in.ibm.com> <20080901090102.46b75141.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <48BB6160.4070904@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20080901130351.f005d5b6.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <48BB8716.5090805@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: Andrew Morton , hugh@veritas.com, menage@google.com, xemul@openvz.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, "nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au" List-ID: On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 11:39:26 +0530 Balbir Singh wrote: > > The development of lockless-page_cgroup is not stalled. I'm just waiting for > > my 8cpu box comes back from maintainance... > > If you want to see, I'll post v3 with brief result on small (2cpu) box. > > > > I understand and I am not pushing you to completing it, but at the same time I > don't want to queue up behind it for long. I suspect the cost of porting > lockless page cache on top of my patches should not be high, but I'll never know > till I try :) > My point is, your patch adds big lock. Then, I don't have to do meaningless effort to reduce lock. Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org