From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 23:46:15 -0700 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] quicklist shouldn't be proportional to # of CPUs Message-Id: <20080820234615.258a9c04.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20080820200709.12F0.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <20080820195021.12E7.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> <20080820200709.12F0.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: KOSAKI Motohiro Cc: LKML , linux-mm , Christoph Lameter , tokunaga.keiich@jp.fujitsu.com List-ID: On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:08:13 +0900 KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > + num_cpus_per_node = cpus_weight_nr(node_to_cpumask(node)); sparc64 allmodconfig: mm/quicklist.c: In function `max_pages': mm/quicklist.c:44: error: invalid lvalue in unary `&' we seem to have a made a spectacular mess of cpumasks lately. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org