From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"yamamoto@valinux.co.jp" <yamamoto@valinux.co.jp>,
"nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
ryov@valinux.co.jp, "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH -mm 0/7] memcg: lockless page_cgroup v1
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:00:06 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080820200006.a152c14c.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080820194108.e76b20b3.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:41:08 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:53:06 +0900
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi, this is a patch set for lockless page_cgroup.
> >
> > dropped patches related to mem+swap controller for easy review.
> > (I'm rewriting it, too.)
> >
> > Changes from current -mm is.
> > - page_cgroup->flags operations is set to be atomic.
> > - lock_page_cgroup() is removed.
> > - page->page_cgroup is changed from unsigned long to struct page_cgroup*
> > - page_cgroup is freed by RCU.
> > - For avoiding race, charge/uncharge against mm/memory.c::insert_page() is
> > omitted. This is ususally used for mapping device's page. (I think...)
> >
> > In my quick test, perfomance is improved a little. But the benefit of this
> > patch is to allow access page_cgroup without lock. I think this is good
> > for Yamamoto's Dirty page tracking for memcg.
> > For I/O tracking people, I added a header file for allowing access to
> > page_cgroup from out of memcontrol.c
> >
> > The base kernel is recent mmtom. Any comments are welcome.
> > This is still under test. I have to do long-run test before removing "RFC".
> >
> Known problem: force_emtpy is broken...so rmdir will struck into nightmare.
> It's because of patch 2/7.
> will be fixed in the next version.
>
This is a quick fix but I think I can find some better solution..
==
Because removal from LRU is delayed, mz->lru will never be empty until
someone kick drain. This patch rotate LRU while force_empty and makes
page_cgroup will be freed.
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
Index: mmtom-2.6.27-rc3+/mm/memcontrol.c
===================================================================
--- mmtom-2.6.27-rc3+.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ mmtom-2.6.27-rc3+/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -893,34 +893,45 @@ static void mem_cgroup_force_empty_list(
struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz,
enum lru_list lru)
{
- struct page_cgroup *pc;
+ struct page_cgroup *pc, *tmp;
struct page *page;
int count = FORCE_UNCHARGE_BATCH;
unsigned long flags;
struct list_head *list;
+ int drain, rotate;
list = &mz->lists[lru];
spin_lock_irqsave(&mz->lru_lock, flags);
+ rotate = 0;
while (!list_empty(list)) {
pc = list_entry(list->prev, struct page_cgroup, lru);
- page = pc->page;
- get_page(page);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mz->lru_lock, flags);
- /*
- * Check if this page is on LRU. !LRU page can be found
- * if it's under page migration.
- */
- if (PageLRU(page)) {
- __mem_cgroup_uncharge_common(page,
- MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_FORCE);
- put_page(page);
+ drain = PcgObsolete(pc);
+ if (drain) {
+ /* Skip this */
+ list_move(&pc->lru);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mz->lru_lock, flags);
+ rotate++;
+ if (rotate > MEMCG_LRU_THRESH/2)
+ mem_cgroup_all_force_drain();
+ cond_resched();
+ } else {
+ page = pc->page;
+ get_page(page);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mz->lru_lock, flags);
+ /*
+ * Check if this page is on LRU. !LRU page can be found
+ * if it's under page migration.
+ */
+ if (PageLRU(page)) {
+ __mem_cgroup_uncharge_common(page,
+ MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_FORCE);
+ }
if (--count <= 0) {
count = FORCE_UNCHARGE_BATCH;
cond_resched();
}
- } else
- cond_resched();
+ }
spin_lock_irqsave(&mz->lru_lock, flags);
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mz->lru_lock, flags);
@@ -954,7 +965,6 @@ static int mem_cgroup_force_empty(struct
}
}
ret = 0;
- mem_cgroup_all_force_drain();
out:
css_put(&mem->css);
return ret;
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-20 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20080819173014.17358c17.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
2008-08-20 9:53 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-08-20 9:55 ` [RFC][PATCH -mm 1/7] memcg: page_cgroup_atomic_flags.patch KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-08-20 9:59 ` [RFC][PATCH -mm 2/7] memcg: delayed_batch_freeing_of_page_cgroup.patch KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-08-20 10:03 ` [RFC][PATCH -mm 3/7] memcg: freeing page_cgroup by rcu.patch KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-08-20 10:04 ` [RFC][PATCH -mm 4/7] memcg: lockless page_cgroup KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-08-20 10:05 ` [RFC][PATCH -mm 5/7] memcg: prefetch mem cgroup per zone KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-08-20 10:07 ` [RFC][PATCH -mm 6/7] memcg: make-mapping-null-before-calling-uncharge.patch KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-08-22 4:57 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-08-22 5:48 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-08-20 10:08 ` [RFC][PATCH -mm 7/7] memcg: add page_cgroup.h header file KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-08-20 10:41 ` [RFC][PATCH -mm 0/7] memcg: lockless page_cgroup v1 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-08-20 11:00 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2008-08-21 2:17 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-08-21 3:36 ` Balbir Singh
2008-08-21 3:58 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-08-21 3:54 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-08-21 8:34 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-08-20 11:33 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080820200006.a152c14c.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=ryov@valinux.co.jp \
--cc=yamamoto@valinux.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox