From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:03:14 +0900 From: KOSAKI Motohiro Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH for -mm 1/5] mlock() fix return values for mainline In-Reply-To: <1218573542.6360.136.camel@lts-notebook> References: <20080811160128.9459.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> <1218573542.6360.136.camel@lts-notebook> Message-Id: <20080813170235.E770.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Lee Schermerhorn Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, linux-mm , Andrew Morton , Rik van Riel List-ID: > On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 16:04 +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > > following patch is the same to http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121750892930775&w=2 > > and it already stay in linus-tree. > > > > but it is not merged in 2.6.27-rc1-mm1. > > > > So, please apply it first. > > Kosaki-san: > > make_pages_present() is called from other places than mlock[_fixup()]. > However, I guess it's OK to put mlock() specific behavior in > make_pages_present() as all other callers [currently] ignore the return > value. Is that your thinking? yup, others ignore it. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org