From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: Pekka J Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, cl@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] SLUB: dynamic per-cache MIN_PARTIAL
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 06:27:51 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080812122751.GY8618@parisc-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0808050037400.26319@sbz-30.cs.Helsinki.FI>
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 12:39:36AM +0300, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> This patch changes the static MIN_PARTIAL to a dynamic per-cache ->min_partial
> value that is calculated from object size. The bigger the object size, the more
> pages we keep on the partial list.
>
> I tested SLAB, SLUB, and SLUB with this patch on Jens Axboe's 'netio' example
> script of the fio benchmarking tool. The script stresses the networking
> subsystem which should also give a fairly good beating of kmalloc() et al.
Hi Pekka,
We tested this patch and it was performance-neutral on TPC-C. I was
hoping it would give a nice improvement ... so I'm disappointed. But at
least there's no regression!
--
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-12 12:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-04 21:39 Pekka J Enberg, Pekka Enberg
2008-08-04 21:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-08-12 12:27 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2008-08-12 12:33 ` Pekka Enberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080812122751.GY8618@parisc-linux.org \
--to=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox