From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:46:21 -0400 From: Rik van Riel Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] mlocked-pages: patch reject resolution and event renames Message-ID: <20080730184621.051ce090@bree.surriel.com> In-Reply-To: <20080730133004.9c0dacbd.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20080730200618.24272.31756.sendpatchset@lts-notebook> <20080730200655.24272.39854.sendpatchset@lts-notebook> <20080730133004.9c0dacbd.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andrew Morton Cc: Lee Schermerhorn , linux-mm@kvack.org, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Eric.Whitney@hp.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com List-ID: On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:30:04 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > I have a feeling that I merged all these patches too soon - the amount > of rework has been tremendous. Are we done yet? I can't speak for the unreclaimable part of the patch series, but the first half of the split LRU series should be in a good shape now that you merged the patch from Johannes Weiner. I am not aware of a situation where the split LRU VM performs worse than what is currently upstream, but I will continue to try finding performance regressions to fix :) -- All rights reversed. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org