From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:27:08 +0200 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH] reserved-ram for pci-passthrough without VT-d capable hardware Message-ID: <20080730122708.GI23938@one.firstfloor.org> References: <1214232737-21267-1-git-send-email-benami@il.ibm.com> <20080729125312.GL11494@duo.random> <20080729131735.GM30344@one.firstfloor.org> <200807301150.44266.amit.shah@qumranet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200807301150.44266.amit.shah@qumranet.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Amit Shah Cc: Andi Kleen , Andrea Arcangeli , benami@il.ibm.com, Avi Kivity , Andrew Morton , kvm@vger.kernel.org, aliguori@us.ibm.com, allen.m.kay@intel.com, muli@il.ibm.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu List-ID: On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:50:43AM +0530, Amit Shah wrote: > * On Tuesday 29 July 2008 18:47:35 Andi Kleen wrote: > > > I'm not so interested to go there right now, because while this code > > > is useful right now because the majority of systems out there lacks > > > VT-d/iommu, I suspect this code could be nuked in the long > > > run when all systems will ship with that, which is why I kept it all > > > > Actually at least on Intel platforms and if you exclude the lowest end > > VT-d is shipping universally for quite some time now. If you > > buy a Intel box today or bought it in the last year the chances are pretty > > high that it has VT-d support. > > I think you mean VT-x, which is virtualization extensions for the x86 > architecture. VT-d is virtualization extensions for devices (IOMMU). No I really mean VT-d. The modern not very lowend Intel IOHubs all have it. -Andi -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org