linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: PERF: performance tests with the split LRU VM in -mm
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:16:50 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080729091650.0ddca3d8@bree.surriel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080729220012.F192.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>

On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:04:16 +0900
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> >   TEST 1: dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/null bs=1M
> > 
> > kernel  speed    swap used
> > 
> > 2.6.26  111MB/s  500kB
> > -mm     110MB/s  59MB     (ouch, system noticably slower)
> > noforce	111MB/s  128kB
> > stream  108MB/s  0        (slight regression, not sure why yet)
> 
> I tried to reproduce it, my ia64 result was
> 
> kernel                   speed        swap used
> 2.6.26-rc8               49.8MB/s     1M
> 2.6.26-rc8-mm1           47.6MB/s     168M
> -mm with above two patch 50.2MB/s     0
> 
> 
> So, I think it isn't regression.

Agreed.  It looked like it, but once I changed the cpuspeed
governor from ondemand to performance, I saw that it had to
be an artifact of something else.

Getting rid of the swap use from a linear IO is the important
part.

-- 
All rights reversed.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-29 13:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-25  2:25 Rik van Riel
2008-07-28 14:57 ` Rik van Riel
2008-07-28 15:30   ` Ray Lee
2008-07-28 23:41   ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-28 23:57     ` Rik van Riel
2008-07-29  0:03       ` Rik van Riel
2008-07-29  0:17         ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-29  0:31           ` Rik van Riel
2008-07-29  0:46           ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-07-29 13:21         ` Johannes Weiner
2008-07-29 13:28           ` Rik van Riel
2008-07-29 13:04 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-07-29 13:16   ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2008-07-29 13:51 ` Johannes Weiner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080729091650.0ddca3d8@bree.surriel.com \
    --to=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox