From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: PERF: performance tests with the split LRU VM in -mm
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:16:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080729091650.0ddca3d8@bree.surriel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080729220012.F192.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:04:16 +0900
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > TEST 1: dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/null bs=1M
> >
> > kernel speed swap used
> >
> > 2.6.26 111MB/s 500kB
> > -mm 110MB/s 59MB (ouch, system noticably slower)
> > noforce 111MB/s 128kB
> > stream 108MB/s 0 (slight regression, not sure why yet)
>
> I tried to reproduce it, my ia64 result was
>
> kernel speed swap used
> 2.6.26-rc8 49.8MB/s 1M
> 2.6.26-rc8-mm1 47.6MB/s 168M
> -mm with above two patch 50.2MB/s 0
>
>
> So, I think it isn't regression.
Agreed. It looked like it, but once I changed the cpuspeed
governor from ondemand to performance, I saw that it had to
be an artifact of something else.
Getting rid of the swap use from a linear IO is the important
part.
--
All rights reversed.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-29 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-25 2:25 Rik van Riel
2008-07-28 14:57 ` Rik van Riel
2008-07-28 15:30 ` Ray Lee
2008-07-28 23:41 ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-28 23:57 ` Rik van Riel
2008-07-29 0:03 ` Rik van Riel
2008-07-29 0:17 ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-29 0:31 ` Rik van Riel
2008-07-29 0:46 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-07-29 13:21 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-07-29 13:28 ` Rik van Riel
2008-07-29 13:04 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-07-29 13:16 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2008-07-29 13:51 ` Johannes Weiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080729091650.0ddca3d8@bree.surriel.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox