From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:27:44 +0900 From: KOSAKI Motohiro Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm: unify pmd_free() implementation In-Reply-To: <488DF119.2000004@gmail.com> References: <488DF119.2000004@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20080729012656.566F.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: righi.andrea@gmail.com Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Linus Torvalds , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > yep! clear. > > Ok, in this case wouldn't be better at least to define pud_free() as: > > static inline pud_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd) > { > } I also like this :) -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org