From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] - GRU virtual -> physical translation
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 09:24:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080714092451.2c81a472.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080714145255.GA23173@sgi.com>
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 09:52:55 -0500 Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 12:17:36PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 14:14:39 -0500 Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Open code the equivalent to follow_page(). This eliminates the
> > > requirement for an EXPORT of follow_page().
> >
> > I'd prefer to export follow_page() - copying-n-pasting just to avoid
> > exporting the darn thing is silly.
>
> If follow_page() can be EXPORTed, I think that may make the most sense for
> now.
What was Christoph's reason for objecting to the export?
> >
> > > In addition, the code
> > > is optimized for the specific case that is needed by the GRU and only
> > > supports architectures supported by the GRU (ia64 & x86_64).
> >
> > Unless you think that this alone justifies the patch?
>
> No, at least not now. We don't have enough data yet to know if the additional
> performance is worth having an optimized lookup routine. Currently the
> focus is in making the driver functionally correct. Performance optimization
> will be done later when we have a better understanding of the user apps that
> will use the GRU.
>
> _IF_ we agree to the export, what is the best way to send you the patches.
> Incremental or an entirely new GRU V3 patch with all issues resolved?
Incremental would be preferred, please.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-14 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-09 19:14 Jack Steiner
2008-07-11 19:17 ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-14 14:52 ` Jack Steiner
2008-07-14 16:24 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-07-14 16:31 ` Jack Steiner
2008-07-14 19:50 ` Robin Holt
2008-07-14 20:01 ` Jack Steiner
2008-07-14 20:37 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-07-14 21:52 ` Jack Steiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080714092451.2c81a472.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=steiner@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox