From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 17:52:13 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] dirty balancing for cgroups Message-Id: <20080711175213.dc69f068.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20080711083446.AC5425A22@siro.lan> References: <20080711161349.c5831081.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20080711083446.AC5425A22@siro.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: YAMAMOTO Takashi Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, menage@google.com, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 17:34:46 +0900 (JST) yamamoto@valinux.co.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote: > hi, > > > > my patch penalizes heavy-writer cgroups as task_dirty_limit does > > > for heavy-writer tasks. i don't think that it's necessary to be > > > tied to the memory subsystem because i merely want to group writers. > > > > > Hmm, maybe what I need is different from this ;) > > Does not seem to be a help for memory reclaim under memcg. > > to implement what you need, i think that we need to keep track of > the numbers of dirty-pages in each memory cgroups as a first step. > do you agree? > yes, I think so, now. may be not difficult but will add extra overhead ;( Sigh.. Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org