From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: mel@csn.ul.ie, agl@us.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foudation.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] -mm-only hugetlb updates
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:50:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080710165019.GB7151@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080710131141.GB6832@wotan.suse.de>
On 10.07.2008 [15:11:41 +0200], Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 11:03:48AM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > As Nick requested, I've moved /sys/kernel/hugepages to
> > /sys/kernel/mm/hugepages. I put the creation of the /sys/kernel/mm
> > kobject in mm_init.c and that required removing the conditional
> > compilation of that file. This also necessitated a bit of Documentation
> > updates (and the addition of the /sys/kernel/mm ABI file). Finally, I
> > realized that kobject usage doesn't require CONFIG_SYSFS, so I was able
> > to remove one ifdef from hugetlb.c.
> >
> > Andrew, I believe these patches, if acceptable, should be folded in
> > place, if possible, in the hugetlb series (that is, the sysfs location
> > should only ever have appeared to be /sys/kernel/mm/hugepages). The ease
> > with which that can occur I guess depends on where Mel's
> > DEBUG_MEMORY_INIT patches are in the series.
> >
> > 1/4: mm: remove mm_init compilation dependency on CONFIG_DEBUG_MEMORY_INIT
> > 2/4: mm: create /sys/kernel/mm
> > 3/4: hugetlb: hang off of /sys/kernel/mm rather than /sys/kernel
> > 4/4: hugetlb: remove CONFIG_SYSFS dependency
>
> Hi Nish,
>
> Thanks for this. Yes I believe this is a much better layout, thank
> you. To answer an earlier question you asked: yes, I believe a lot of
> existing kernel subsystems aren't really in appropriate location and
> there probably hasn't been a lot of thought into placement of some of
> them.
>
> Imagine if every subsystem just goes into /sys/kernel/ directory, then
> it might look something like `ls /proc/sys/*` all in one directory :P
Fair enough :) I agree that it's worth considering these issues,
especially if we really intend to treat sysfs as ABI.
> I'm not sure what we can do about existing things (maybe they can get
> links and eventually put under one of those compat sysfs layout
> thingies). But definitely for new entries we should try to keep the
> namespace nice and modular.
That's probably the best we can do, you're right.
> Acked-by: Nick Piggin < npiggin@suse.de> for all patches.
Thanks,
Nish
--
Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
IBM Linux Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-10 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-08 18:03 Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-07-08 18:05 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] mm: remove mm_init compilation dependency on CONFIG_DEBUG_MEMORY_INIT Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-07-08 18:06 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] mm: create /sys/kernel/mm Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-07-08 18:07 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] hugetlb: hang off of /sys/kernel/mm rather than /sys/kernel Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-07-08 18:08 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] hugetlb: remove CONFIG_SYSFS dependency Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-07-10 17:39 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] hugetlb: hang off of /sys/kernel/mm rather than /sys/kernel Mel Gorman
2008-07-10 17:24 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] mm: create /sys/kernel/mm Mel Gorman
2008-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] mm: remove mm_init compilation dependency on CONFIG_DEBUG_MEMORY_INIT Mel Gorman
2008-07-08 18:13 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] -mm-only hugetlb updates Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-07-10 13:11 ` Nick Piggin
2008-07-10 16:50 ` Nishanth Aravamudan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080710165019.GB7151@us.ibm.com \
--to=nacc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=agl@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foudation.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox