From: Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@drzeus.cx>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: How to alloc highmem page below 4GB on i386?
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 00:02:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080705000259.3d74c5b6@mjolnir.drzeus.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080704133733.278b6458@infradead.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2268 bytes --]
On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 13:37:33 -0700
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 22:23:23 +0200
> Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@drzeus.cx> wrote:
> >
> > I was under the impression that the PCI bus was utterly incapable of
> > any larger address than 32 bits? But perhaps you only consider PCIE
> > stuff high-perf. :)
>
> actually your impression is not correct. There's a difference between
> how many physical bits the bus has, and the logical data. Specifically,
> PCI (and PCIE etc) have something that's called "Dual Address Cycle",
> which is a pci bus transaction that sends the 64 bit address using 2
> cycles on the bus even if the buswidth is 32 bit (logically).
>
Ah, I see. I have to admit to only have read the PCI spec briefly. :)
Still, the devices I'm poking have 32-bit fields, so the limitation is
still there for my case.
> >
> > The strange thing is that I keep getting pages from > 4GB all the
> > time, even on a loaded system. I would have expected mostly getting
> > pages below that limit as that's where most of the memory is. Do you
> > have any insight into which areas tend to fill up first?
>
> ok this is tricky and goes way deep into buddy allocator internals.
> On the highest level (2Mb chunks iirc, but it could be a bit or
> two bigger now) we allocate top down. But once we split such a top level
> chunk up, inside the chunk we allocate bottom up (so that the scatter
> gather IOs tend to group nicer).
> In addition, the kernel will prefer allocating userspace/pagecache
> memory from highmem over lowmem, out of an effort to keep memory
> pressure in the lowmem zones lower.
>
For the test I'm playing with, in does a second order allocation, which
I suppose has good odds of finding a suitable hole somewhere in the
upper GB.
Ah well, I suppose this highmem business will eventually blow over. ;)
Thanks
--
-- Pierre Ossman
Linux kernel, MMC maintainer http://www.kernel.org
rdesktop, core developer http://www.rdesktop.org
WARNING: This correspondence is being monitored by the
Swedish government. Make sure your server uses encryption
for SMTP traffic and consider using PGP for end-to-end
encryption.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-04 22:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-30 18:03 Pierre Ossman
2008-07-04 17:58 ` Pierre Ossman
2008-07-04 18:12 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-07-04 20:23 ` Pierre Ossman
2008-07-04 20:37 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-07-04 22:02 ` Pierre Ossman [this message]
2008-07-04 22:24 ` Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080705000259.3d74c5b6@mjolnir.drzeus.cx \
--to=drzeus-list@drzeus.cx \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox