From: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
To: Linux Containers <containers@lists.osdl.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto@valinux.co.jp>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
IKEDA Munehiro <m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com>
Subject: [PATCH -mm 5/5] swapcgroup (v3): implement force_empty
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 15:24:23 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080704152423.f65932b3.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080704151536.e5384231.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
This patch implements force_empty of swapcgroup.
Currently, it simply uncharges all the charges from the group.
I think there can be other implementations.
What I thought are:
- move all the charges to its parent.
- unuse(swap in) all the swap charged to the group.
But in any case, I think before implementing this way,
hierarchy and move charges support are needed.
So I think this is enough for the first step.
Change log
v2->v3
- new patch
Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
---
include/linux/memcontrol.h | 5 ++++
mm/memcontrol.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
mm/swapfile.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
3 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index 1e6eb0c..8c4bad0 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -177,6 +177,7 @@ extern void swap_cgroup_uncharge(struct swap_info_struct *si,
unsigned long offset);
extern struct mem_cgroup *page_to_memcg(struct page *page);
extern int swap_cgroup_vm_swap_full(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
+extern void __swap_cgroup_force_empty(struct mem_cgroup *mem);
#else
static inline
struct mem_cgroup **swap_info_clear_memcg(struct swap_info_struct *p)
@@ -211,6 +212,10 @@ static inline int swap_cgroup_vm_swap_full(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
{
return 0;
}
+
+static inline void __swap_cgroup_force_empty(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
+{
+}
#endif
#endif /* _LINUX_MEMCONTROL_H */
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 160fca1..f93907c 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -826,6 +826,34 @@ static void mem_cgroup_force_empty_list(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mz->lru_lock, flags);
}
+static inline int mem_cgroup_in_use(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
+{
+ return mem->res.usage > 0;
+}
+
+static inline int swap_cgroup_in_use(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_SWAP_RES_CTLR
+ return mem->swap_res.usage > 0;
+#else
+ return 0;
+#endif
+}
+
+static void __mem_cgroup_force_empty(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
+{
+ int node, zid;
+
+ for_each_node_state(node, N_POSSIBLE)
+ for (zid = 0; zid < MAX_NR_ZONES; zid++) {
+ struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz;
+ enum lru_list l;
+ mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(mem, node, zid);
+ for_each_lru(l)
+ mem_cgroup_force_empty_list(mem, mz, l);
+ }
+}
+
/*
* make mem_cgroup's charge to be 0 if there is no task.
* This enables deleting this mem_cgroup.
@@ -833,7 +861,6 @@ static void mem_cgroup_force_empty_list(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
static int mem_cgroup_force_empty(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
{
int ret = -EBUSY;
- int node, zid;
css_get(&mem->css);
/*
@@ -841,18 +868,17 @@ static int mem_cgroup_force_empty(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
* active_list <-> inactive_list while we don't take a lock.
* So, we have to do loop here until all lists are empty.
*/
- while (mem->res.usage > 0) {
+ while (mem_cgroup_in_use(mem) || swap_cgroup_in_use(mem)) {
if (atomic_read(&mem->css.cgroup->count) > 0)
goto out;
- for_each_node_state(node, N_POSSIBLE)
- for (zid = 0; zid < MAX_NR_ZONES; zid++) {
- struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz;
- enum lru_list l;
- mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(mem, node, zid);
- for_each_lru(l)
- mem_cgroup_force_empty_list(mem, mz, l);
- }
+
+ if (mem_cgroup_in_use(mem))
+ __mem_cgroup_force_empty(mem);
+
+ if (swap_cgroup_in_use(mem))
+ __swap_cgroup_force_empty(mem);
}
+
ret = 0;
out:
css_put(&mem->css);
@@ -1289,6 +1315,7 @@ void swap_cgroup_uncharge(struct swap_info_struct *si,
* and called swap_entry_free().
* 2. when this swap entry had been assigned by
* get_swap_page_of_type() (via SWSUSP?).
+ * 3. force empty can make such entries.
*/
if (mem) {
res_counter_uncharge(&mem->swap_res, PAGE_SIZE);
diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
index 6a863bc..2263ae8 100644
--- a/mm/swapfile.c
+++ b/mm/swapfile.c
@@ -704,15 +704,30 @@ static int unuse_mm(struct mm_struct *mm,
}
/*
+ * return the mem_cgroup to which a entry is charged
+ */
+static inline struct mem_cgroup *entry_to_memcg(swp_entry_t entry)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_SWAP_RES_CTLR
+ return swap_info[swp_type(entry)].memcg[swp_offset(entry)];
+#else
+ return NULL;
+#endif
+}
+
+/*
* Scan swap_map from current position to next entry still in use.
+ * If mem is specified, the entry should be charged to it.
* Recycle to start on reaching the end, returning 0 when empty.
*/
static unsigned int find_next_to_unuse(struct swap_info_struct *si,
- unsigned int prev)
+ unsigned int prev,
+ struct mem_cgroup *mem)
{
unsigned int max = si->max;
unsigned int i = prev;
int count;
+ int type = si - swap_info;
/*
* No need for swap_lock here: we're just looking
@@ -735,7 +750,8 @@ static unsigned int find_next_to_unuse(struct swap_info_struct *si,
i = 1;
}
count = si->swap_map[i];
- if (count && count != SWAP_MAP_BAD)
+ if (count && count != SWAP_MAP_BAD
+ && (!mem || mem == entry_to_memcg(swp_entry(type, i))))
break;
}
return i;
@@ -782,7 +798,7 @@ static int try_to_unuse(unsigned int type)
* one pass through swap_map is enough, but not necessarily:
* there are races when an instance of an entry might be missed.
*/
- while ((i = find_next_to_unuse(si, i)) != 0) {
+ while ((i = find_next_to_unuse(si, i, NULL)) != 0) {
if (signal_pending(current)) {
retval = -EINTR;
break;
@@ -1923,5 +1939,35 @@ struct mem_cgroup *page_to_memcg(struct page *page)
out:
return mem;
}
+
+/*
+ * uncharge all the entries that are charged to the group.
+ */
+void __swap_cgroup_force_empty(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
+{
+ struct swap_info_struct *p;
+ int type;
+
+ spin_lock(&swap_lock);
+ for (type = swap_list.head; type >= 0; type = swap_info[type].next) {
+ p = swap_info + type;
+
+ if ((p->flags & SWP_ACTIVE) == SWP_ACTIVE) {
+ unsigned int i = 0;
+
+ spin_unlock(&swap_lock);
+ while ((i = find_next_to_unuse(p, i, mem)) != 0) {
+ spin_lock(&swap_lock);
+ if (p->swap_map[i] && p->memcg[i] == mem)
+ swap_cgroup_uncharge(p, i);
+ spin_unlock(&swap_lock);
+ }
+ spin_lock(&swap_lock);
+ }
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&swap_lock);
+
+ return;
+}
#endif
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-04 6:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-04 6:15 [PATCH -mm 0/5] swapcgroup (v3) Daisuke Nishimura
2008-07-04 6:17 ` [PATCH -mm 1/5] swapcgroup (v3): add cgroup files Daisuke Nishimura
2008-07-10 20:35 ` Dave Hansen
2008-07-11 11:02 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-07-04 6:18 ` [PATCH -mm 2/5] swapcgroup (v3): add a member to swap_info_struct Daisuke Nishimura
2008-07-04 6:20 ` [PATCH -mm 3/5] swapcgroup (v3): implement charge and uncharge Daisuke Nishimura
2008-07-04 6:22 ` [PATCH -mm 4/5] swapcgroup (v3): modify vm_swap_full() Daisuke Nishimura
2008-07-04 9:58 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-07-04 10:40 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-07-04 6:24 ` Daisuke Nishimura [this message]
2008-07-04 6:54 ` [PATCH -mm 5/5] swapcgroup (v3): implement force_empty YAMAMOTO Takashi
2008-07-04 7:26 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-07-04 7:48 ` YAMAMOTO Takashi
2008-07-04 7:56 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-07-04 10:16 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-07-04 12:33 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-07-05 4:29 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-07-07 6:23 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-07-04 9:40 ` [PATCH -mm 0/5] swapcgroup (v3) KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-07-04 10:58 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-07-05 6:52 ` Balbir Singh
2008-07-07 6:48 ` Daisuke Nishimura
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080704152423.f65932b3.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--to=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
--cc=yamamoto@valinux.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox