From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>,
babydr@baby-dragons.com, cl@linux-foundation.org,
lee.schermerhorn@hp.com, a.beregalov@gmail.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [problem] raid performance loss with 2.6.26-rc8 on 32-bit x86 (bisected)
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 17:38:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080703163836.GD18055@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1215064455.15797.4.camel@dwillia2-linux.ch.intel.com>
On (02/07/08 22:54), Dan Williams didst pronounce:
>
> On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 22:00 -0700, Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> > Subject: [PATCH] Do not overwrite nr_zones on !NUMA when initialising zlcache_ptr
> >
> > With the two-zonelist patches on !NUMA machines, there really is only one
> > zonelist as __GFP_THISNODE is meaningless. However, during initialisation, the
> > assumption is made that two zonelists exist when initialising zlcache_ptr. The
> > result is that pgdat->nr_zones is always 0. As kswapd uses this value to
> > determine what reclaim work is necessary, the result is that kswapd never
> > reclaims. This causes processes to stall frequently in low-memory situations
> > as they always direct reclaim. This patch initialises zlcache_ptr correctly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
> > ---
> > page_alloc.c | 1 -
> > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff -rup -X /usr/src/patchset-0.6/bin//dontdiff linux-2.6.26-rc8-clean/mm/page_alloc.c linux-2.6.26-rc8-fix-kswapd-on-numa/mm/page_alloc.c
> > --- linux-2.6.26-rc8-clean/mm/page_alloc.c 2008-06-24 18:58:20.000000000 -0700
> > +++ linux-2.6.26-rc8-fix-kswapd-on-numa/mm/page_alloc.c 2008-07-02 21:49:09.000000000 -0700
> > @@ -2328,7 +2328,6 @@ static void build_zonelists(pg_data_t *p
> > static void build_zonelist_cache(pg_data_t *pgdat)
> > {
> > pgdat->node_zonelists[0].zlcache_ptr = NULL;
> > - pgdat->node_zonelists[1].zlcache_ptr = NULL;
> > }
> >
> > #endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
> >
>
> Bug squished.
>
> # for i in `seq 1 5`; do dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/md0 bs=1024k count=2048; done
> 2048+0 records in
> 2048+0 records out
> 2147483648 bytes (2.1 GB) copied, 7.73352 s, 278 MB/s
> 2048+0 records in
> 2048+0 records out
> 2147483648 bytes (2.1 GB) copied, 7.6845 s, 279 MB/s
> 2048+0 records in
> 2048+0 records out
> 2147483648 bytes (2.1 GB) copied, 7.74428 s, 277 MB/s
> 2048+0 records in
> 2048+0 records out
> 2147483648 bytes (2.1 GB) copied, 7.65959 s, 280 MB/s
> 2048+0 records in
> 2048+0 records out
> 2147483648 bytes (2.1 GB) copied, 7.73107 s, 278 MB/s
>
> Tested-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
>
Great news. Dan, thanks a lot for reporting and persisting with the testing
of various bits and pieces to get this pinned down. It is greatly appreciated.
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-03 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-01 1:57 Dan Williams
2008-07-01 8:09 ` Mel Gorman
2008-07-01 17:58 ` Andy Whitcroft
2008-07-01 19:07 ` Mel Gorman
2008-07-01 20:29 ` Dan Williams
2008-07-02 5:18 ` Mel Gorman
2008-07-03 1:49 ` Dan Williams
2008-07-03 4:27 ` Mel Gorman
2008-07-03 4:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-03 5:00 ` Mel Gorman
2008-07-03 5:54 ` Dan Williams
2008-07-03 13:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-07-03 16:36 ` [PATCH] Do not clobber pgdat->nr_zones during memory initialisation Mel Gorman
2008-07-03 16:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-03 16:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-03 17:16 ` Mel Gorman
2008-07-03 16:38 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2008-07-01 22:28 ` [problem] raid performance loss with 2.6.26-rc8 on 32-bit x86 (bisected) Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080703163836.GD18055@csn.ul.ie \
--to=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=a.beregalov@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apw@shadowen.org \
--cc=babydr@baby-dragons.com \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox