Re: [PATCH 2/4] pull out zone cpuset and watermark checks for reuse

[KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>]

Hi Andy,

this is nit.


> +/*
> + * Return 1 if this zone is an acceptable source given the cpuset
> + * constraints.
> + */
> +static inline int zone_cpuset_ok(struct zone *zone,
> +					int alloc_flags, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> +{
> +	if ((alloc_flags & ALLOC_CPUSET) &&
> +	    !cpuset_zone_allowed_softwall(zone, gfp_mask))
> +		return 0;
> +	return 1;
> +}

zone_cpuset_ok() seems cpuset sanity check.
but it is "allocatable?" check.

in addition, "ok" is slightly vague name, IMHO.


> +/*
> + * Return 1 if this zone is within the watermarks specified by the
> + * allocation flags.
> + */
> +static inline int zone_alloc_ok(struct zone *zone, int order,
> +			int classzone_idx, int alloc_flags, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> +{
> +	if (!(alloc_flags & ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS)) {
> +		unsigned long mark;
> +		if (alloc_flags & ALLOC_WMARK_MIN)
> +			mark = zone->pages_min;
> +		else if (alloc_flags & ALLOC_WMARK_LOW)
> +			mark = zone->pages_low;
> +		else
> +			mark = zone->pages_high;
> +		if (!zone_watermark_ok(zone, order, mark,
> +			    classzone_idx, alloc_flags)) {
> +			if (!zone_reclaim_mode ||
> +					!zone_reclaim(zone, gfp_mask, order))
> +				return 0;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	return 1;
> +}

zone_alloc_ok() seems check "allocatable? or not".
So, I like zone_reclaim() go away from its function.



--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>