From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:31:31 +0900 From: KOSAKI Motohiro Subject: Re: [-mm][PATCH 10/10] putback_lru_page()/unevictable page handling rework v4 In-Reply-To: <20080625151316.58ed195e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20080625191237.D86D.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> <20080625151316.58ed195e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Message-Id: <20080626103000.FCFC.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andrew Morton Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com, riel@redhat.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com List-ID: > And that's kind-of OK. It's messy, but we could live with it. However > as I expect there will be more fixes to these patches before all this > work goes into mainline, this particular patch will become more of a > problem as it will make the whole body of work more messy and harder to > review and understand. > > So. Can this patch be simplified in any way? Or split up into > finer-grained patches or something like that? Yes, sir! I'll do it. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org