From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 02:53:15 +0200 From: Andrea Arcangeli Subject: Re: [patch 0/5] [RFC] Conversion of reverse map locks to semaphores Message-ID: <20080626005315.GB6938@duo.random> References: <20080626003632.049547282@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080626003632.049547282@sgi.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Christoph Lameter Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, apw@shadowen.org, Hugh Dickins , holt@sgi.com, steiner@sgi.com List-ID: Ah great, so you're maintaining those! Just a moment before seeing this I post, I uploaded them too at this URL: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/patches/v2.6/2.6.26-rc7/mmu-notifier-v18/ Since you're taking care of this yourself should I feel free to remove those from my patchset right? With a VM hat I don't think those lock changes should be unconditional... especially for the anon-vma case where the common case are small critical section. But then with a KVM hat those won't make the slightest difference to my current interesting workload, so it's truly not my concern if those goes in as-is. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org