From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:49:05 +0900 From: KOSAKI Motohiro Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] putback_lru_page()/unevictable page handling rework v3 In-Reply-To: <20080621185408.E832.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <20080621185408.E832.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> Message-Id: <20080624184122.D838.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: KOSAKI Motohiro Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Lee Schermerhorn , linux-mm , LKML List-ID: I found one bug ;) > -int putback_lru_page(struct page *page) > +#ifdef CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU > +void putback_lru_page(struct page *page) > { > int lru; > - int ret = 1; > int was_unevictable; > > - VM_BUG_ON(!PageLocked(page)); > VM_BUG_ON(PageLRU(page)); > > + was_unevictable = TestClearPageUnevictable(page); > + > +redo: > lru = !!TestClearPageActive(page); > - was_unevictable = TestClearPageUnevictable(page); /* for page_evictable() */ (snip) > + mem_cgroup_move_lists(page, lru); > + > + /* > + * page's status can change while we move it among lru. If an evictable > + * page is on unevictable list, it never be freed. To avoid that, > + * check after we added it to the list, again. > + */ > + if (lru == LRU_UNEVICTABLE && page_evictable(page, NULL)) { > + if (!isolate_lru_page(page)) { > + put_page(page); > + goto redo; at this point, We should call ClearPageUnevictable(). otherwise, BUG() is called on isolate_lru_pages(). -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org