From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 09:28:24 -0400 From: Rik van Riel Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] prevent incorrect oom under split_lru Message-ID: <20080624092824.4f0440ca@bree.surriel.com> In-Reply-To: <20080624171816.D835.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <20080624171816.D835.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: KOSAKI Motohiro Cc: linux-mm , LKML , Lee Schermerhorn , akpm@linux-foundation.org List-ID: On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:31:54 +0900 KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > if zone->recent_scanned parameter become inbalanceing anon and file, > OOM killer can happened although swappable page exist. > > So, if priority==0, We should try to reclaim all page for prevent OOM. You are absolutely right. Good catch. > Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro Acked-by: Rik van Riel > --- > mm/vmscan.c | 6 ++++-- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > Index: b/mm/vmscan.c > =================================================================== > --- a/mm/vmscan.c > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c > @@ -1464,8 +1464,10 @@ static unsigned long shrink_zone(int pri > * kernel will slowly sift through each list. > */ > scan = zone_page_state(zone, NR_LRU_BASE + l); > - scan >>= priority; > - scan = (scan * percent[file]) / 100; > + if (priority) { > + scan >>= priority; > + scan = (scan * percent[file]) / 100; > + } > zone->lru[l].nr_scan += scan + 1; > nr[l] = zone->lru[l].nr_scan; > if (nr[l] >= sc->swap_cluster_max) > -- All rights reversed. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org