linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Takenori Nagano <t-nagano@ah.jp.nec.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Keiichi KII <kii@linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [patch] memory reclaim more  efficiently
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:49:10 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080623102854.37BE.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <485EF481.30409@ah.jp.nec.com>

Hi nagano-san,

> In shrink_zone(), system can not return to user mode before it finishes to
> search LRU list. IMHO, it is very wasteful, since the user processes stay
> unnecessarily long time in shrink_zone() loop and application response time
> becomes relatively bad. This patch changes shrink_zone() that it finishes memory
> reclaim when it reclaims enough memory.
> 
> the conditions to end searching:
> 
> 1. order of request page is 0
> 2. process is not kswapd.
> 3. satisfy the condition to return try_to_free_pages()
>    # nr_reclaim > SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX

I have 3 question.

1. Do you have any performance number?
2. I think this patch advocate many try_to_free_pages() called is better than
   one try_to_free_page waste long time. right?
   and, why do you think so?
3. if this patch improve perfomance, I guess DEF_PRIORITY is
   too small on your machine.
   if DEF_PRIORITY is proportional to system memory, do your problem are solved?



--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2008-06-23  1:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-23  0:55 Takenori Nagano
2008-06-23  1:49 ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2008-06-23  4:54   ` Takenori Nagano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080623102854.37BE.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kii@linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=t-nagano@ah.jp.nec.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox