linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linuxppc-dev list <Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [RFC:PATCH 05/06] powerpc: Add Strong Access Ordering
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:01:24 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080610220123.10257.69686.sendpatchset@norville.austin.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080610220055.10257.84465.sendpatchset@norville.austin.ibm.com>

Things I don't like about this patch:

1. All the includes I added to asm-powerpc/mman.h
2. It doesn't look like mmap() used to validate prot.  Now instead of
ignoring invalid values, it will return -EINVAL.  Could this be a problem?
3. Are these new functions in any hot paths that the extra instructions will
add any significant overhead?

Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---

 arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls.c |    3 +++
 include/asm-powerpc/mman.h     |   26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)

diff -Nurp linux004/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls.c linux005/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls.c
--- linux004/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls.c	2008-06-05 10:07:32.000000000 -0500
+++ linux005/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls.c	2008-06-10 16:48:59.000000000 -0500
@@ -143,6 +143,9 @@ static inline unsigned long do_mmap2(uns
 	struct file * file = NULL;
 	unsigned long ret = -EINVAL;
 
+	if (!arch_validate_prot(prot))
+		goto out;
+
 	if (shift) {
 		if (off & ((1 << shift) - 1))
 			goto out;
diff -Nurp linux004/include/asm-powerpc/mman.h linux005/include/asm-powerpc/mman.h
--- linux004/include/asm-powerpc/mman.h	2008-06-10 16:48:59.000000000 -0500
+++ linux005/include/asm-powerpc/mman.h	2008-06-10 16:48:59.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,7 +1,9 @@
 #ifndef _ASM_POWERPC_MMAN_H
 #define _ASM_POWERPC_MMAN_H
 
+#include <asm/cputable.h>
 #include <asm-generic/mman.h>
+#include <linux/mm.h>
 
 /*
  * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
@@ -26,4 +28,28 @@
 #define MAP_POPULATE	0x8000		/* populate (prefault) pagetables */
 #define MAP_NONBLOCK	0x10000		/* do not block on IO */
 
+#define HAVE_ARCH_PROT_BITS
+
+/*
+ * This file is included by linux/mman.h, so we can't use cacl_vm_prot_bits()
+ * here.  How important is the optimization?
+ */
+static inline unsigned long arch_calc_vm_prot_bits(unsigned long prot)
+{
+	return (prot & PROT_SAO) ? VM_SAO : 0;
+}
+
+static inline pgprot_t arch_vm_get_page_prot(unsigned long vm_flags)
+{
+	return (vm_flags & VM_SAO) ? __pgprot(_PAGE_SAO) : 0;
+}
+
+static inline int arch_validate_prot(unsigned long prot)
+{
+	if (prot & ~(PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE | PROT_EXEC | PROT_SEM | PROT_SAO))
+		return 1;
+	if ((prot & PROT_SAO) && !cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_SAO))
+		return 1;
+	return 0;
+}
 #endif	/* _ASM_POWERPC_MMAN_H */

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-06-10 22:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-10 22:00 [RFC:PATCH 00/06] Strong Access Ordering page attributes for POWER7 Dave Kleikamp
2008-06-10 22:01 ` [RFC:PATCH 01/06] powerpc: hash_huge_page() should get the WIMG bits from the lpte Dave Kleikamp
2008-06-10 22:01 ` [RFC:PATCH 02/06] mm: Allow architectures to define additional protection bits Dave Kleikamp
2008-06-10 22:14   ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-11 15:47     ` Dave Kleikamp
2008-06-10 22:01 ` [RFC:PATCH 03/06] powerpc: Define flags for Strong Access Ordering Dave Kleikamp
2008-06-10 22:01 ` [RFC:PATCH 04/06] powerpc: Define CPU_FTR_SAO Dave Kleikamp
2008-06-10 22:01 ` Dave Kleikamp [this message]
2008-06-10 22:01 ` [RFC:PATCH 06/06] powerpc: Don't clear _PAGE_COHERENT when _PAGE_SAO is set Dave Kleikamp
2008-06-10 22:26   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-06-11  3:12     ` Dave Kleikamp

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080610220123.10257.69686.sendpatchset@norville.austin.ibm.com \
    --to=shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox