From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 11:27:52 -0400 From: Rik van Riel Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/25] Vm Pageout Scalability Improvements (V8) - continued Message-ID: <20080530112752.66b6580f@bree.surriel.com> In-Reply-To: <18496.4309.393775.511382@stoffel.org> References: <20080529195030.27159.66161.sendpatchset@lts-notebook> <20080529131624.60772eb6.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080529162029.7b942a97@bree.surriel.com> <18496.1712.236440.420038@stoffel.org> <20080530102917.45cbca64@bree.surriel.com> <18496.4309.393775.511382@stoffel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: John Stoffel Cc: Andrew Morton , Lee Schermerhorn , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, eric.whitney@hp.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, npiggin@suse.de List-ID: On Fri, 30 May 2008 10:36:05 -0400 "John Stoffel" wrote: > Rik> If you manage to break performance with my patch set somehow, > Rik> please let me know so I can fix it. Something like the VM is > Rik> very subtle and any change is pretty much guaranteed to break > Rik> something, so I am very interested in feedback. > > What are you using to test/benchmark your changes as you develop this > patchset? What would you suggest as a test load to help check > performance? Your normal workload. I am doing some IO throughput, swap throughput and database tests, however those are probably not representative of what YOU throw at the VM. There are no VM benchmarks that cover everything, so what is needed most at this point is real world exposure. I cannot promise that the code is perfect; all I can promise is that I will try to fix any performance issue that people find. -- All rights reversed. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org