From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 09:57:11 +0900 From: KOSAKI Motohiro Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] lockless get_user_pages In-Reply-To: <8763t1w1ko.fsf@saeurebad.de> References: <20080525145227.GC25747@wotan.suse.de> <8763t1w1ko.fsf@saeurebad.de> Message-Id: <20080527095519.4676.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Johannes Weiner Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Nick Piggin , Andrew Morton , shaggy@austin.ibm.com, jens.axboe@oracle.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, apw@shadowen.org List-ID: > > Introduce a new "fast_gup" (for want of a better name right now) > > Perhaps, > > * get_address_space > * get_address_mappings > * get_mapped_pages > * get_page_mappings > > Or s@get_@ref_@? Why get_user_pages_lockless() is wrong? or get_my_pages() is better? (because this method assume task is current task) -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org