From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc: Linux Containers <containers@lists.osdl.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>,
YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto@valinux.co.jp>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
"IKEDA, Munehiro" <m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] swapcgroup: implement charge/uncharge
Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 09:57:06 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080526095706.c90a0afb.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4836AFFD.3060605@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
On Fri, 23 May 2008 20:52:29 +0900
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> wrote:
> On 2008/05/22 16:37 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> > On Thu, 22 May 2008 15:20:05 +0900
> > Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> wrote:
> >
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_SWAP_RES_CTLR
> >> +int swap_cgroup_charge(struct page *page,
> >> + struct swap_info_struct *si,
> >> + unsigned long offset)
> >> +{
> >> + int ret;
> >> + struct page_cgroup *pc;
> >> + struct mem_cgroup *mem;
> >> +
> >> + lock_page_cgroup(page);
> >> + pc = page_get_page_cgroup(page);
> >> + if (unlikely(!pc))
> >> + mem = &init_mem_cgroup;
> >> + else
> >> + mem = pc->mem_cgroup;
> >> + unlock_page_cgroup(page);
> >
> > If !pc, the page is used before memory controller is available. But is it
> > good to be charged to init_mem_cgroup() ?
> I'm sorry, but I can't understand this situation.
> memory controller is initialized at kernel initialization,
> so aren't processes created after it is initialized?
>
I think add_to_page_cache() may be called before late_init..I'll check again.
(Because I saw some panics related to it, but I noticed this is _swap_ controller
...)
> > How about returning 'failure' in this case ? I think returning 'failure' here
> > is not so bad.
> >
> >
> Which of below do you mean by 'failure'?
>
> A. make it fail to get swap entry, so the page cannot be swapped out.
> B. don't charge this swap entry to any cgroup, but the page
> would be swapped out.
means A.
>
> I don't want to do B, because I don't want to make such
> not-charged-to-anywhere entries.
> And I've seen several times this condition(!pc) becomes true,
> so I charged to init_mem_cgroup.
>
>
> BTW, I noticed that almost all of functions I added by this patch set
> should check "mem_cgroup_subsys.disabled" first because it depend on
> memory cgroup.
>
Ah, yes, please.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-26 0:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-22 6:13 [PATCH 0/4] swapcgroup(v2) Daisuke Nishimura
2008-05-22 6:17 ` [PATCH 1/4] swapcgroup: add cgroup files Daisuke Nishimura
2008-05-22 6:18 ` [PATCH 2/4] swapcgroup: add member to swap_info_struct for cgroup Daisuke Nishimura
2008-05-22 7:23 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-22 8:46 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-05-22 9:35 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-22 6:20 ` [PATCH 3/4] swapcgroup: implement charge/uncharge Daisuke Nishimura
2008-05-22 7:37 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-23 11:52 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-05-26 0:57 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2008-05-27 13:42 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-22 6:22 ` [PATCH 4/4] swapcgroup: modify vm_swap_full for cgroup Daisuke Nishimura
2008-05-22 6:45 ` YAMAMOTO Takashi
2008-05-22 12:34 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-05-25 23:35 ` YAMAMOTO Takashi
2008-05-22 7:39 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-22 8:00 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-05-22 12:22 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-05-22 12:32 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-05-23 12:26 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-05-22 7:44 ` [PATCH 0/4] swapcgroup(v2) KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-23 2:10 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-05-23 2:42 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-05-22 21:27 ` Balbir Singh
2008-05-23 4:27 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-05-27 7:31 ` YAMAMOTO Takashi
2008-05-27 7:42 ` Balbir Singh
2008-05-27 8:30 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-05-27 13:18 ` Balbir Singh
2008-05-27 13:42 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-05-27 13:46 ` Balbir Singh
2008-05-27 14:00 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-05-23 2:26 ` Rik van Riel
2008-05-23 3:10 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-23 3:32 ` Rik van Riel
2008-05-23 3:59 ` Balbir Singh
2008-05-23 4:30 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-05-23 4:51 ` Balbir Singh
2008-05-23 5:23 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-23 5:29 ` David Singleton
2008-05-23 6:00 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-05-23 6:45 ` Balbir Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080526095706.c90a0afb.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
--cc=yamamoto@valinux.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox