From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
To: fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp
Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
jens.axboe@oracle.com, tsbogend@alpha.franken.de,
bzolnier@gmail.com, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com,
jeff@garzik.org, davem@davemloft.net, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] block: use ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN as the default dma pad mask
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 21:55:15 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080521215515G.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080521214624Y.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
On Wed, 21 May 2008 21:46:24 +0900
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> On Wed, 21 May 2008 20:22:18 +0800
> Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 09:09:58PM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > >
> > > OK, thanks. So it's about hardware requrement. Let me make sure if I
> > > understand crypto alignment issue.
> > >
> > > __crt_ctx needs ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN alignment only because of crypto
> > > hardware. If I misunderstand it, can you answer my question in the
> > > previous mail (it's the part that you cut)? That is, why does
> > > __crt_ctx need ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN alignment with software
> > > algorithms.
> >
> > Because the same structure is used for all algorithms!
>
> No, you misunderstand my question. I meant, software algorithms don't
> need ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN alignment for __crt_ctx and if we are fine
> with using the ALIGN hack for crypto hardware every time (like
> aes_ctx_common), crypto doesn't need ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN alignment
> for __crt_ctx. Is this right?
>
>
> >
> > Why is this so hard to understand?
>
> Because there are few architecture that defines
> ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN. So if crypto hardware needs alignement, it's
> likely the hardware alignement is larger than __crt_ctx alignment. As
> a result, you have to use ALIGN_PTR. So It's hard to understand using
> ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN here. I don't know about crypto hardware, but I
> wonder if we can use a static alignment like 64 bytes here, which may
> work for most of crypto hardware. Or if there are not many users of
Oops, scratch the static alignment. It's impossible.
> crypto hardware, it may be fine to use ALIGN_PTR for the hardware.
I still wonder it's acceptable or not.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-21 12:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1211259514-9131-1-git-send-email-fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
[not found] ` <1211259514-9131-2-git-send-email-fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
2008-05-20 9:31 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-20 9:38 ` Herbert Xu
2008-05-20 9:52 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-20 9:58 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-05-20 11:32 ` Herbert Xu
2008-05-20 13:25 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-05-20 15:34 ` Herbert Xu
2008-05-20 16:09 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-05-21 1:26 ` Herbert Xu
2008-05-21 1:36 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-05-21 3:16 ` Herbert Xu
2008-05-21 6:54 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-05-21 8:47 ` Herbert Xu
2008-05-21 9:34 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-05-21 10:05 ` Herbert Xu
2008-05-21 11:01 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-05-21 11:25 ` Herbert Xu
2008-05-21 12:09 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-05-21 12:22 ` Herbert Xu
2008-05-21 12:46 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-05-21 12:55 ` FUJITA Tomonori [this message]
2008-05-21 13:19 ` Herbert Xu
2008-05-21 13:18 ` Herbert Xu
2008-05-22 1:14 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-05-22 1:19 ` David Miller, FUJITA Tomonori
2008-05-22 1:21 ` Herbert Xu
2008-05-22 1:32 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-05-22 1:56 ` Herbert Xu
2008-05-20 9:55 ` Paul Mundt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080521215515G.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--to=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox