From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 17:32:09 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 4/6] memcg: shmem reclaim helper Message-Id: <20080514173209.860d1c1d.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <482AA16D.7060200@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <20080514170236.23c9ddd7.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20080514171025.2f0fb1ca.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <482A9FB5.4020202@cn.fujitsu.com> <20080514172531.672e0447.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <482AA16D.7060200@cn.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Li Zefan Cc: LKML , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , "xemul@openvz.org" , "yamamoto@valinux.co.jp" , "hugh@veritas.com" , Andrew Morton List-ID: On Wed, 14 May 2008 16:23:09 +0800 Li Zefan wrote: > KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > > On Wed, 14 May 2008 16:15:49 +0800 > > Li Zefan wrote: > > > >>> + while(!progress && --retry) { > >>> + progress = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(mem, gfp_mask); > >>> + } > >> This is wrong. How about: > >> do { > >> ... > >> } while (!progress && --retry); > >> > > Ouch, or retry--.... > > > > retry-- is still wrong, because then after while, retry will be -1, and then: > > + if (!retry) > + return -ENOMEM; > ok, i'm now rewriting. Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org